"MCP" <gf010w5035@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:M6QWj.10727$Pp2.9180@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/05/14/mccain-lampoons-the-gender-wage-gap-myth/
>
> Carey Roberts
>
> Ready for a morning chuckle to jump-start your day? Pay a visit to
Hillary
> Clinton's website that claims with a straight face, "Women still earn
> significantly less money than men for doing the same jobs."
> [www.hillaryclinton.com/video/13.aspx]
>
> The first part of Hillary's sentence is true - women indeed earn less
than
> men.
> But the last four words - "for doing the same jobs" - is as laughable as
> Hillary's
> dodging-sniper-bullets-in-Bosnia tale.
>
> Let's say you have a job opening and two persons apply who have
identical
> skills
> and qualifications. Joe wants to be paid the prevailing wage, while
Jackie
> says
> she is willing to work for only 77 cents on the dollar.
>
> Who would you hire? Jackie, of course.
>
> So if women are doing exactly the same work as men and getting paid 23%
> less,
> every profit-maximizing entrepreneur would hire only women. But last I
> heard,
> men are still getting jobs. Obviously there's something wrong with the
> gender
> wage gap theory.
>
> Last month Senator McCain was campaigning in the hard-scrabble coal
fields
> of
> Kentucky. He commented that if women want to overcome the gender wage
gap,
> they
> would need more "education and training." And knowing that Women's
Studies
> grads
> might not realize that coal mining is the economic mainstay of the
region,
> McCain then deadpanned, "traditionally, women have not gone into that
line
> of
> work."
>
> But the Funny-Fems reflexively insist the culprit is *** discrimination,
> not
> women exercising the right to choose their preferred work. So when they
> heard
> Senator McCain's comments, they flew into a purple-passion rage. Within
> days
> MoveOn rolled out its propaganda machine, making the claim that "Study
> after
> study has shown that women are paid less than men for the same work."
They're full of ****. In fact, females are overpaid for what they do. I
think we're going to have to get really tough with these *****es who
spread
this disinformation. The problem with men is that they're too soft and
kind
and females take this as a sign of weakness which it's their Nature to
exploit. Never argue with a female or try to use logic. If a female tries
to
spout this feminist bull****, shout her down or disrupt their little
bull**** fest. If they march bomb them with rotten eggs or horse****. See
if
they'll march again lol Females will only engage in this bull**** if
it's
safe or they have some girly man like a cop protecting their little
feelings. Once it gets tough they all turn into helpless confused little
girls(which is what they are) just as Hillary did in the debates.
>
> That's good for another belly laugh, of course, because in eastern
> Kentucky, the
> best paying jobs go to the sooty-faced men who are willing to descend
900
> feet
> into the ground and hope a boulder doesn't break loose from the mine
roof.
> That's
> what happened to Cornelius Yates, who was crushed to death in a Kentucky
> coal
> mine in January 2006.
>
> Yates' death came just a week after 12 miners were killed in a West
> Virginia
> mine explosion. And that followed a year in which nine miners died
> throughout
> Kentucky.
Oh, and let me remind you that these are in modern mines today with all
sorts of safety precautions. Imagine what it was like years ago.
>
> Not surprisingly, women are not very interested in doing hazardous jobs
> that may
> send them to the grave. Indeed study after study has shown that when
> differences
> in the type of work, hours on the job, and education are accounted for,
> women
> are treated fairly.
Fairly? They are overpaid for what they do. 95% of females have jobs you
can
train a 14yo girl to do.
>
> Actually, women may be doing better than men. According to the National
> Association of Colleges and Employers, in many fields female college
grads
> are
> being offered higher starting salaries than their male counterparts.
>
> Female physicists are getting $6,500 more. Co-eds who majored in
petroleum
> engineering are being offered $4,400 more. And women computer
programmers
> are
> being enticed with $7,200 extra pay. In fact for dozens of majors and
> occupations, women coming out of college are getting better offers than
> men,
> reveals Warren Farrell in his book, Why Men Earn More.
Very few females are interested in working. Work to a female is like
socialising and the higher the position they get just means that they are
in
contact with wealthier men which is their whole objective.
>
> Why these disparities? Because in traditionally male-dominated
> professions,
> employers are willing to ante up more greenbacks to attract females in
> order to
> forestall a costly discrimination lawsuit.
>
> So once again the radical left is caught red-handed, trying to push a
> socialist
> scheme that centralizes bureaucratic control and weakens free markets.
> That's
> the approach that brought the Soviet economy to its knees 20 years ago.
>
> The Sisters of Silliness are out of touch with the needs of women. By
> scorning
> the notion of education and disempowering women, they prove they are
> trying to
> force women into a dependency relation****p at the ****cine foot-stool of
> the
> government trough.
>
|
