On May 7, 8:28 am, ecoman <nigel.ecov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 6, 5:07 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 6, 8:47 am, ecoman <nigel.ecov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 5, 8:19 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > <And next time try to at least
> > > get my name right if not my gender.>
>
> > > My, my! angry arent we...
>
> > Uh, no. Amused and enlightened by your very poor reading and
> > observational skills, which surely account for the misinformed things
> > you post.
>
> > > you fell for it every inch of the way...
>
> > <chuckle> Ah yes, the backfilling begins!
>
> > > you
> > > cannot even read the text correctly thats why your ignorant and your
> > > arrogance is trying to hide it
>
> > BWAHAAHAAAAA!!! You get *my* name wrong by incorrectly reading the
> > text, and somehow *I* can=92t read!!
>
> > Thanks, Nigel, you made my morning. The other kooks this morning
> > weren=92t nearly as pathetic as you!!
>
> > =93Angry!!=94 BWWAHAHAAHAAHAHAAAAA!!!
>
> <you made my morning.>
>
> So glad I made your morning...you were predictably
> responsive...nothing new just more of your textual chunder...one will
> continue to expect the same. Have a nice day now.
Wrong as usual, Nigel! And of course, that=92s your introspective
projection at work: You were the one whose responses were predictable.
It=92s a wonder you could get ANYTHING right if you could possible have
read anger* into my hearty amusement at your stupidity. If you=92d
followed this at all, you=92d know that no one takes this very seriously
but the kookers. For me it=92s free amusement.
The fact that I ripped you a new asshole on the merits is just icing
on the cake. I mean, you actually tried to turn *your* reading and
spelling errors into *my* problem! <chuckle>
Run along!
|
