Re: obarmy radically changes his stance on iran to get closer to the bush position.....

On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:40 -0600, Flash Bazbo
<djflsdkjf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Sat, 17 May 2008 01:23:24 +0200, abelard <abelard3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:

>>despite surrounding his change of stance with tap dancing with a slew
>>     of fancy steps and arm waving to distract from his radical
>>     sideslip...
>>this is the critical sentence..:-
>>
>>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1032236.aspx
>>"It's time to present Iran with a clear choice. If it abandons its
>>nuclear program, sup****t for terror, and threats to Israel, then Iran
>>can rejoin the community of nations. If not, Iran will face deeper
>>isolation and steeper sanctions."
>>
>>
>>of course he has, as a coward, left out any definition of just what he
>>       means in the real world by 'steeper sanctions'....
>>
>>does he mean he'll speak severely to iran when he sits down with
>>     the lunatics in iran....?
>>or will he go even further and raise his voice?
>>
>>of course he could mean he'll nuke tehran if they don't stop acting
>>     as a rogue state....
>>
>>typical of the dishonest politician that he is, he makes vague noises
>>      which fools will read whatever way they wish...
>>
>>     the moonbat left will doubtless be 'thinking' in terms of a
>>     gentle 'speaking to'....
>>
>>     where as gung ho hawks will be more inclined to think in
>>     terms of a severe 'seeing to'....
>>
>>
>>
>>perhaps someone one day will ask him to be specific....
>>then moveon and the rest of the moonbats will doubtless raise
>>     their usual cackle about 'racism' and demand that the questioner
>>     shut up and wor****p the obarmy rhetoric instead.....
>>
>>and obarmy will give the  world another rousing chorus of..
>>
>>yes we can...yes we can...yes  we can
>
>He'd be foolish to cite specifics at this stage.  What specific steps
>has our glorious president proposed?

the general line has been 'they will not be allowed to go nuclear'
with no hedging....

that could hardly be more clear within sane diplospeak

-- 
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics 
 energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 do***ent calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  all that is necessary for       []     walk quietly and carry
  the triumph of evil is that      []           a big stick.
  good people do nothing     []   trust actions not words
                    only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------