On Sat, 17 May 2008 01:23:24 +0200, abelard <abelard3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>despite surrounding his change of stance with tap dancing with a slew
> of fancy steps and arm waving to distract from his radical
> sideslip...
>this is the critical sentence..:-
>
>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1032236.aspx
>"It's time to present Iran with a clear choice. If it abandons its
>nuclear program, sup****t for terror, and threats to Israel, then Iran
>can rejoin the community of nations. If not, Iran will face deeper
>isolation and steeper sanctions."
Um, and how, exactly, moron, does your stupid ass imagine this is to
somehow
be a "radical" change from what he's been saying all along?
<tap, tap, tap>
No doubt your stupid,mendacious conservadolt ass can QUOTE where Obama
*ever* said ANYTHING that was "radically different," right?
<tap, tap, tap>
Do. If you're not just a moron stuffed to the brim full of ****, that
is...
>of course he has, as a coward, left out any definition of just what he
> means in the real world by 'steeper sanctions'....
So , is it "steeper" or "sanctions" That you're too ****ing stupid to
comprehend?
>does he mean he'll speak severely to iran when he sits down with
> the lunatics in iran....?
Does "sanctions"mean "speech"? Um, no...
>or will he go even further and raise his voice?
Does "sanctions" mean "rais(ing) his voice"? Um, no...
>of course he could mean he'll nuke tehran if they don't stop acting
> as a rogue state....
Does "sanctions" mean "all out nuclear attack"? Um, no...
>typical of the dishonest politician that he is, he makes vague noises
> which fools will read whatever way they wish...
Typical of the stupid asshole conservadolt rightard you are, you don't
even
know what "sanctions"means. The simple fact, simpleton, is "sanctions"
does
not mean what you think it means...
But mere ignorance will never stop a truly committed incredible imbecile
like you from furiously farting hilariously stupid nonsense.
> the moonbat left will doubtless be 'thinking' in terms of a
> gentle 'speaking to'....
Actually, subliterate moron, the left knows full well what
"sanctions"means.
The vast majority of us, you see, are, unlike the majority of
conservadolts,
fluent in English.
> where as gung ho hawks will be more inclined to think in
> terms of a severe 'seeing to'....
Amazing. Precisely how ****ing STUPID must one be before the simple
concept
of "sanctions" becomes an impossibly complex philological problem?
>perhaps someone one day will ask him to be specific....
Perhaps one day your stupid goober ass will learn to speak ENGLISH.
>then moveon and the rest of the moonbats will doubtless raise
> their usual cackle about 'racism' and demand that the questioner
> shut up and wor****p the obarmy rhetoric instead.....
Worry about your won stupid ass rather than making stupid predictions...
>and obarmy will give the world another rousing chorus of..
>
>yes we can...yes we can...yes we can
Obviously you are not part of "we, as obviously you CAN'T...
Here, you stupid mother****er, allow me to enlighten your subliterate
goober
ass as to the germane definition of "sanctions"...
------
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sanction
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1
sanction
/'sæ?k??n/ [sangk-shuhn]
–noun
5. International Law. action by one or more states toward another state
calculated to force it to comply with legal obligations.
------
There you go, moron. Sanctions are ACTION, not speech. Duh, duh, duh, you
stupid mother****er...
Now, is this clear enough for you or shall we tattoo it backwards on your
stupid ass for easy future reference?
BTW, moron, must we also reference "steeper," or can your stupid ass grasp
the concept of an increased gradient?
Jaybus Freaking Crisco, what a MAROON this luser is...
---
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right.
------
Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough?
http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
© 1999 by the American Psychological Association
December 1999 Vol. 77, No. 6, 1121-1134
Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own
Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-*****sments
Justin Kruger and David Dunning
Department of Psychology
Cornell University
ABSTRACT:
....the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile
on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test
performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the
12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd.
|
