ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
© Copyright all materials written by Author DGV Reiman 2008, all rights
reserved. By posting or publi****ng this article and other copyrighted
articles on USENET and/or elsewhere, Author is expressly NOT granting
any implied authorization to reproduce his copyrighted work in any
manner. The Author further does not accept as "Fair Use" under U.S. Code
Title 17, nor will condone, the reproduction of any ****tion of his
copyrighted materials IN ANY MANNER for the purpose of harassing,
stalking or defaming the Author, or in conjunction with any violation of
any civil or criminal statutes. Violators will face legal action. If
anyone wishes to reproduce my copyrighted materials all they need to do
first is email me and receive back via email my written permission to do
so - such permission will not be unreasonably withheld. As I have often
stated, I post copyrighted articles on USENET for a pre-review by the
public prior to placing those articles in a book to be sold in
international commerce. All those that read these articles already know
or should already know my copyrighted articles cannot be infringed upon
in any manner simply because they were first posted on USENET. Moreover,
according to case law and expert answers in respect to this issue, the
general stated policy of newgroups, such as to invite comment, DOES NOT
preclude, supercede nor abrogate the author's right of copyright
protection. Moreover, case law has further provided a precedent that
"Fair Use" cannot be claimed by an infringer to disguise the spiteful
and defaming reproduction of an author's work.
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all of
my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contem****ary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please notify me of
your specific reasons for annoyance via email at legalcoach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain, and
to present articles to USENET readers prior to publication to determine
interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way cause anyone
emotional harm by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please note that
defending myself from harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has
been deemed a "lawful and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel.
If I am not attacked, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles
not interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP's and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site
or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
op****tunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
IN ADDITION, considering the typical ridiculous, absurd and obviously
false claims about my military service that originates from Sp4 Nigel
Brooks and his Brownie crackpot gang, I also hereby certify and attest
this article is NOT a secret coded message that only Sp4 Nigel Brooks
can decode with his secret Federal Agent midget decoder and mind reading
ring. This means Mr. Sp4 Brooks, Mr. Uy Uy's (and their Brownie
crackpots that echo their every fraud and false accusation) inevitable
claims that this article is me really claiming in a soothsaying code (a
code Nigel Brooks and crackpots et al gang can only read of course which
involves the standard nonsensical Nigel Brooks mind reading claims) that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam and
then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member of
the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained by
the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable fangs
(slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in Vietnam
and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of all, I went
to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even before I was
born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA. Such preposterous Sp4 Nigel Brooks'/Tom Rau and
crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims about me are, as usual,
blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask them for proof of their
claims the next time they make such ludicrous claims and watch them
scurry for their rocks).
OBAMA THROWS ANOTHER GUTTER BALL
When President Bush said in Israel that people that negotiate with
terrorists are appeasers and comparable to those fools that tried to
negotiate with Adolph Hitler, the Barack Hussein Obama political machine
went into high hysterics in response:
Here is what President Bush actually said:
"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals,
as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong
all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks
crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: "Lord, if
only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been
avoided." We have an obligation to call this what it is - the false
comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by
history."
The Barak Hussein Obama "south Chicago shuck and jive" political machine
was quick to respond (no "the US gave Aids to black people" howls and
barks this time, but similar).
BHO said:
President Bush/John McCain are "FAILURES," HOWL, BARK, WHINE! "THEY MADE
IRAN MORE POWERFUL," SNARL, GROWL, SHOUT, "ANY DAY ANY PLACE I WILL
DEBATE MCCAIN ABOUT FOREIGN POLICY" BLUSTER, PUFF, AND ROAR!
"What we need is CHANGE! CHANGE FROM THE BUSH DOCTRINE - WE ARE NOT
SAFER! WE NEED CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE . . . AND CHANGE! HOWL,
BLUSTER, SNORT, AND ROAR, SAID BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.
Then one of his "sweeties" in the Press Corps asked him the following
question:
"Mr. Obama, if after you become President and you could speak with the
President of Iran, what would you say to him?"
BHO replied with: (I am paraphrasing).
"I would sit down with the President of Iran and offer him incentives to
(1) stop his nuclear program and to stop his attacks on Israel, and (2)
stop sup****ting terrorists."
SAY WHAT???? Where in the hell is the "CHANGE" from the Bush policy in
such a statement?
Has not the Europeans, the Asians, the Girl Scouts, the Egyptians, the
Saudis, the Modocs, the Martians, all with the backing and sponsor****p
of the United States and the United Nations ALL offered that very same
precise offer to Iran about ten thousand times so far and counting? OF
COURSE THEY HAVE! And what has Iran done in response? Thumbed noses at
all offers, said they were increasing their nuclear weapons' program,
again vowed to wipe Israel off the map, and increased their training and
sup****t of terrorists murdering Americans and civilians in both Iraq and
in Afghanistan.
So BHO calls "change" a simple repeat of the Bush doctrine and tactics
with Iran? You have got to be kidding!
With all the hype and shucking and jiving about Barack Hussein Obama
coming from his sup****ters I was sure I would hear some incredibly
insightful revelation, some mind enhancing epiphanies, some high
philosophical insight that would be wondrous and mind moving to behold
and would, in its forced epiphany on the President of Iran, convince the
Iranians to bow their heads in shame, shed a tear for their past evil
deeds, and turn a new leaf praising Barack Hussein Obama's genius while
all the time asking the world; "can't we just get along?"
But no, just like in the Wizard of Oz, it seems there is a little man
behind the curtain pulling the levers and blowing all the smoke and
howls. And this little man behind the curtain blowing all the smoke
knows no more than President Bush, and has no more insight on how to
stop Iran than his mentor and close political advisor for twenty years;
the Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
Talking with the Animals
When you talk or negociate directly with terrorists you provide them
with credibility - you convince their population their tactics are
winning, and the President of the United States, hat in hand, has come
begging for Iran to stop puni****ng the USA for its evil deeds against
Allah.
The day BHO sits down with Mahmound Ahmadinejad and whines for peace,
the radical Muslim Mosques' throughout the Muslim world will all
proclaim victory, and will thereby, recruit more suicide bombers,
insurgents, money and financing such as the world has never seen before.
BHO clearly suffers a delusion that Iran actually wants to avoid war
with Israel and the USA, and nothing could be further from the truth.
Iran is building nuclear weapons to give them to its various terrorist
factions it controls, such as Haamas, the Palestinians, the Jerusalem
Brigade, the ****ite Militias, and of course Al Qaida. All of those
Iranian backed terrorist organizations have sworn to destroy Israel and
the USA or die in the process - and there are hundreds of thousands of
them ready to "die for Allah."
BHO also seems to suffer the self-serving delusion that if our Congress
had not approved the liberation of Iraq and the removal of Saddam the
radical Muslim insurgents and terrorists would have not entered
Afghanistan in the same force as they entered Iraq. The BHO crowd wants
the world to believe that Afghanistan is a "good war" and Iraq "is a bad
war." Yet ask any General, or other expert on this issue, and they will
tell you that both Afghanistan and Iraq are the same war! Had we not
liberated Iraq our forces would be fighting the same amount of
terrorists in Afghanistan as we are now fighting in Iraq. Only then we
also would have a hostile Saddam Hussein and his Republican Guard Army
on our flanks, and Saddam would have been helping to train and finance
even more terrorists and insurgents for entry into Afghanistan.
Nothing in the world short of pre-emptive military strikes, or the
complete covert overthrow of the Iranian theocracy, is going to stop
Iran from producing nuclear weapons and giving them to their terrorist
militias. Sitting down and having tea with these monsters is NOT the
answer - a good and effective bombing mission is the only answer at this
point in time - and if Mr. Binyamin Netanyahu is elected Prime Minister
in Israel I suspect that is precisely what is going to happen - then
what will BHO do? Offer more "Tea and Crumpets" to our enemies as the
bombs start to fly?
Where in the hell do these dregs and idiots come from that would be King
of America? South Chicago? Peanut Farms? Please, wasn't one Jimmy Carter
enough?
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-BD4145.16425216052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <n8GdnVrTGuRkQrDVnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> - - - - - [nothing of consequence deleted] - - - - -
>
>
Snip cyberstalking and copyright violations. Mr. Rau, you have been
notified several times to cease your harassment, fraud, false
accusations, forgeries and copyright violations, again I demand you
cease and desist at once.
Please be advised of the following: (A copy of this notice will be sent
to my lawyer).
MR. THOMAS RAU: This is your ___25TH______notice to cease and desist
publi****ng, posting or speaking any and all harassment and/or
cyberstalking, and/or obloquy, and/or defamation/slander, and/or
invasion of my privacy, and/or libel directed to me or about me in any
manner, including assisting others to do the same, or perpetrating the
same acts under different names, via USENET, via the Internet, via web
sites, via newsgroups, via Email, via telephone, or by other form of
communication or publi****ng. If you wish to receive this notice via
personal and direct certified mail from my lawyer, please respond with
an address in which this do***ent can be sent to you at
legalcoach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has also come to my attention that you are allegedly using or have
used or have incited other internet names to also perpetrate the overt
acts against me as stated above. If applicable, please cease and desist
using or inciting different fake names to facilitate and further your
smear, cyberstaking and harassment campaign against me.
2. You have been advised several times before that I consider your
USENET posts referencing me to be a direct communication to me for the
purpose of harassment or cyberstalking or abuse or torment or offense
and/or embarrassment and/or defamation and obloquy.
3. Your posting pattern on USENET about me has been carefully reviewed ,
and it demonstrates a clear and unmistakable deliberate, and obsessive,
deliberate intent to harass and/or stalk and/or libel and/or defame me
in almost every way imaginable.
4. In addition to your obsessive desire to continue to harass, defame,
smear and stalk me with your USENET posts, you also are repeatedly
violating my copyrights. Moreover, your pattern of spitefully violating
my copyrights does not lend itself to any belief you are doing so under
any fair use defense nor doctrine.
5. Please immediately cease and desist infringing on my copyrights. You
are hereby expressly forbidden to reproduce any of my copyrighted
materials without my express permission in writing.
6. Please do not consider this notice as any kind of threat. This notice
is not meant to be a threat of any kind, only an official legal notice
for you to immediately cease and desist the actions previously stated
herein or I will be forced to take appropriate legal action against you
to stop you from perpetrating said acts.
7. Please do not respond to this notice unless you wish to receive it
directly from my lawyer. If you have retained a lawyer please have him
contact me at the legalcoach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
email address indicated above.
8. Please consider my repeated notices to you to cease and desist the
above as related to the following standard legal provision (4) in
respect to harassment and cyberstalking statutes found in most states,
and recognized by most courts:
4) "In a prosecution for a violation of this section, evidence that the
defendant continued to engage in a course of conduct involving repeated
unconsented contact with the victim after having been requested by the
victim to discontinue the same or a different form of unconsented
contact, and to refrain from any further unconsented contact with the
victim, gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the continuation of
the course of conduct caused the victim to feel terrorized, frightened,
intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested."
Douglas Reiman
I have also included some information below as an attachment that you
may or may not find interesting:
Items of possible interest provided as an attachment:
Federal crime cases
Basically, there are two scenarios leading to the filing of a criminal
case in federal court: (1) there is an alleged violation of federal, as
opposed to state, law; or (2) the crime alleged took place on federal
property. Actions which violate both state and federal laws may be
prosecuted in either (or both) jurisdictions without violating the
constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.
Acts committed on federal property may violate either state or federal
laws as well, although they will always be prosecuted in federal court
by virtue of the fact that they occurred on federal property. If an act
committed on federal property violates state law only, it will be
prosecuted in federal court under the substantive law of the state where
it occurred, although federal rules and procedures will apply.
(Not smart to use Federal Property to unlawfully harass, incite hatred
against or stalk someone - instant Felony.)
"Rep. MCDERMOTT (Wa****ngton State) said he was prompted to act by the
case of Joelle Ligon, a Seattle woman who was sent menacing e-mails,
falsely accused of résumé-padding in messages to co-workers and
impersonated in ***-oriented Internet chat rooms from 1998 to 2003."
Note that Internet chat rooms and falsely impersonating a person in
emails, and being sent menacing emails were ALL mentioned and were
clearly involved in the Congressional intent of the anonymous
cyberstalker legislation and the new cyberstalking law. A USENET post
repeatedly directed toward a particular person is (1) a form of
communication to that person (2) is a communication to that person via a
third party (3) if such publications contain a pattern of defamation and
libel, and false accusations, then that communication represents a
published libel, defamation published though international commerce.
"A scholar who specializes in cyber law says the law could be difficult
to overturn. Susan B"renner, a University of Dayton law professor and a
consultant to the Secret Service on cyber laws, says courts likely would
read "annoy" together with the words that follow it - "abuse, threaten
or harass" - and conclude that the law refers to specific behavior."
In 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit used that
reasoning to uphold the conviction of Erik Bowker, an Ohio man who had
stalked a Youngstown television re****ter via telephone."
http://tinyurl.com/ypqgbw
Criminal and Civil copyright violations: U.S.C. Title 17.
Oregon Cyberstalking and Harassment Statues: http://tinyurl.com/65nlbe
Michigan Cyberstalking and Harassment stautes:
http://tinyurl.com/5nvo9k
"(4) In a prosecution for a violation of this
section, evidence that the defendant continued to engage in a course of
conduct involving repeated unconsented contact with the victim after
having been requested by the victim to discontinue the same or a
different form of unconsented contact, and to refrain from any further
unconsented contact with the victim, gives rise to a rebuttable
presumption that the continuation of the course of conduct caused the
victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened,
harassed, or molested.
(5) A criminal penalty provided for under this section may be imposed in
addition to any penalty that may be imposed for any other criminal
offense arising from the same conduct or for any contempt of court
arising from the same conduct."
Hawaii Cyberstalking and Harassment Stautes:
http://tinyurl.com/6o6lz5
"Rpeatedly makes communications, after being
advised by the person to whom the communication is directed that further
communication is unwelcome;"
Texas Cyberstalking and Harassment Statutes:
PENAL CODE
TITLE 9. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER AND DECENCY
CHAPTER 42. DISORDERLY CONDUCT AND RELATED OFFENSES
Sec.A42.07.AAHARASSMENT.A (a)AAA person commits an offense
if, with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass
another, he:.
"(7)AAsends repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably
likely to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend
another.
(b)AAIn this section:
(1)AA"Electronic communication" means a transfer of signs, signals,
writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of
any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio,
electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo-optical system."
"In a prosecution for a violation of this section, evidence that the
defendant continued to engage in a course of conduct involving repeated
unconsented contact with the victim after having been requested by the
victim to discontinue the same or a different form of unconsented
contact, and to refrain from any further unconsented contact with the
victim, gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the continuation of
the course of conduct caused the victim to feel terrorized, frightened,
intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested."
http://tinyurl.com/5pwl4p
§ 7.02. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCT OF
ANOTHER. (a) A person is criminally responsible for an offense committed
by the conduct of another if: (1) acting with the kind of culpability
required for the offense, he causes or aids an innocent or
nonresponsible person to engage in conduct prohibited by the definition
of the offense; (2) acting with intent to promote or assist the
commission of the offense, he solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or
attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense; or (3) having a
legal duty to prevent commission of the offense and acting with intent
to promote or assist its commission, he fails to make a reasonable
effort to prevent commission of the offense. (b) If, in the attempt to
carry out a conspiracy to commit one felony, another felony is committed
by one of the conspirators, all conspirators are guilty of the felony
actually committed, though having no intent to commit it, if the offense
was committed in furtherance of the unlawful purpose and was one that
should have been anticipated as a result of the carrying out of the
conspiracy.
California Stalking:
http://tinyurl.com/5tlf28
Wa****ngton State: Cyberstalking:
http://tinyurl.com/2mvyo2
"1) A person is guilty of cyberstalking if he
or she, with intent to harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass any
other person, and under cir***stances not constituting telephone
harassment, makes an electronic communication to such other person or a
third party:
(a) Using any lewd, lascivious, indecent, or obscene words, images, or
language, or suggesting the commission of any lewd or lascivious act;
(b) Anonymously or repeatedly whether or not conversation occurs; or
(c) Threatening to inflict injury on the person or property of the
person called or any member of his or her family or household."
Wa****ngton State: Unlawful Harassment: http://tinyurl.com/6q53hn
1) A person is guilty of harassment if:
(a) Without lawful authority, the person knowingly threatens:
(i) To cause bodily injury immediately or in the future to the person
threatened or to any other person; or
(ii) To cause physical damage to the property of a person other than the
actor; or
(iii) To subject the person threatened or any other person to physical
confinement or restraint; or
(iv) Maliciously to do any other act which is intended to substantially
harm the person threatened or another with respect to his or her
physical or mental health or safety; and
(b) The person by words or conduct places the person threatened in
reasonable fear that the threat will be carried out. "Words or conduct"
includes, in addition to any other form of communication or conduct, the
sending of an electronic communication.
(2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, a person who
har***** another is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Wa****ngton State: Stalking: http://tinyurl.com/388nzj
RCW 9A.46.110
Stalking.
(1) A person commits the crime of stalking if, without lawful authority
and under cir***stances not amounting to a felony attempt of another
crime:
(a) He or she intentionally and repeatedly har***** or repeatedly
follows another person; and
(b) The person being harassed or followed is placed in fear that the
stalker intends to injure the person, another person, or property of the
person or of another person. The feeling of fear must be one that a
reasonable person in the same situation would experience under all the
cir***stances; and
(c) The stalker either:
(i) Intends to frighten, intimidate, or harass the person; or
(ii) Knows or reasonably should know that the person is afraid,
intimidated, or harassed even if the stalker did not intend to place the
person in fear or intimidate or harass the person.
(2)(a) It is not a defense to the crime of stalking under subsection
(1)(c)(i) of this section that the stalker was not given actual notice
that the person did not want the stalker to contact or follow the
person; and
(b) It is not a defense to the crime of stalking under subsection
(1)(c)(ii) of this section that the stalker did not intend to frighten,
intimidate, or harass the person.
Wa****ngton State Definitions: http://tinyurl.com/5wvn7e
RCW 10.14.020
Definitions.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this
section apply throughout this chapter.
(1) "Unlawful harassment" means a knowing and willful course of conduct
directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, har*****,
or is detrimental to such person, and which serves no legitimate or
lawful purpose. The course of conduct shall be such as would cause a
reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and shall
actually cause substantial emotional distress to the petitioner, or,
when the course of conduct would cause a reasonable parent to fear for
the well-being of their child.
(2) "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series
of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of
purpose. "Course of conduct" includes, in addition to any other form of
communication, contact, or conduct, the sending of an electronic
communication. Constitutionally protected activity is not included
within the meaning of "course of conduct."
Abuse of Usenet: Cyberstalked - http://www.jahitchcock.com/cyberstalked/
Jayne Hitchock's battle with Usenet spammer Woodside Literary Agency
began in 1996, and continued into 2002 with her cyberstalkers sentenced
to prison and probation on charges of conspiracy to commit mail fraud,
perjury and making false statements to a federal officer. Hitchcock's
site details the case from start to finish, and shows how it led to new
laws making cyberstalking a criminal offense in New Hamp****re (USA).
End items of possible interest.
>
|
