Re: US soldier refuses to serve in 'illegal Iraq war'

"Info Junkie" <bondrock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:7gvu24t1m30emsckmjg7evk74qjcmnboi2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 19:07:18 -0400, * US * wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:49:56 -0400, Bushwor****pping Blood Junkie 
>><bondrock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>... warped little mind ...
>>
>>You hate America so much you sup****t those
>>who betray its soldiers to their deaths with lies.
>
> ROTFLMHO. Which "lies" are you referring to? Soldiers volunteered, and
> deaths occur in the military. The sergeant referred to in this thread
> voluntarily joined AFTER the USA was already in Iraq. Show which
> soldiers were drafted into the military.
>
>>Perle admitted the illegality of the invasion.
>
> Who cares what "Perle admitted"? He's not a judge and his opinion has
> as much "weight" as your own, i.e. none.
>
>>That's too complex for you to understand, even if you
>>did respect the rule of law, bushfilth.
>
> ...and all you had to do was "prove the following:
>
> A. Provide the Court ruling (US federal or US Military) showing this
> sergeant's written orders to Iraq are illegal.
>
> B. Provide the US Court ruling the "invasion of Iraq is
> unconstitutional"
>
> ...and you couldn't even prove "A." or "B." , relying instead on the
> sole opinion of someone whose legal opinion has as much weight in a
> courtroom as your own, i.e., none.
>
> Translation, you offer nothing to refute my facts. Understood.
> ROTFLMHO
>
>>On Sat, 17 May 2008 07:00:20 -0400, Bushkultie Blood Junkie 
>><bondrock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>... dishonerable [sic]
>>
>>You hate America too much to learn English, don't you.
>
> Previously addressed
>>
>>No soldier is obligated to obey illegal orders, and the
>>invasion of Iraq is unconstitutional.
>
> Previously addressed
>>
>>>On Fri, 16 May 2008 21:43:37 -0700 (PDT), Raymond <Bluerhymer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 17, 12:26?am, cmdr buzz corey <cmdr-buzz-co...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> On May 16, 10:13 pm, Mike Roberts <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> > US soldier refuses to serve in 'illegal Iraq war'
>>>>>
>>>>> > May 16 10:49 AM US/Eastern
>>>>> > Matthis Chiroux is the kind of young American US military
recruiters 
>>>>> > love.
>>>>>
>>>>> > "I was from a poor, white family from the south, and I did badly
in
>>>>> > school," the now 24-year-old told AFP.
>>>>>
>>>>> > "I was 'filet mignon' for recruiters. They started phoning me when
I 
>>>>> > was
>>>>> > in 10th grade," or around 16 years old, he added.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Chiroux joined the US army straight out of high school nearly six 
>>>>> > years
>>>>> > ago, and worked his way up from private to sergeant.
>>>>>
>>>>> > He served in Afghanistan, Germany, Japan, and the Philippines and 
>>>>> > was
>>>>> > due to be deployed next month in Iraq.
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Thursday, he refused to go, saying he considers Iraq an illegal

>>>>> > war.
>>>>
>>>>War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector
>>>>enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today.
>>>> ~John F. Kennedy
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately he doesn't have the authority to make the decision of
>>>>> whether the war is illegal or not, or whether he serves even if he
>>>>> does think it is illegal. He should have thought about all that
before
>>>>> he signed the dotted line.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>>They wrote in the old days that it is sweet and fitting to die for
>>>>one's country.  But in modern war there is nothing sweet nor fitting
>>>>in your dying.  You will die like a dog for no good reason.
>>>>~Ernest Hemingway
>>

Good one....You made that retard look like a total dumbass. ;-)

Harley