Re: Bush: U.S. To Supply Enriched Uranium to Saudi Arabia

Bill Bonde { ''the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack'') wrote:
> 
> Sid9 wrote:
>> "Bill Bonde { ''the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack'')"
>> <tributyltinpaint@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:482F8863.FA2F280@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "Steven L." wrote:
>>>
>>>> The perfect gift for a country that already has 22% of the world's
oil
>>>> supply:  Enriched uranium!
>>>>
>>>> This is a classic case of "Only Nixon Could Go To China."
>>>>
>>>> Obama should thank Bush for making this deal for him.  President
Obama
>>>> could never get away with it--everybody would say it's appeasement.
>>>>
>>>> But after Bush's strong speech against appeasement yesterday, he can
>>>> safely send enriched uranium to Saudi Arabia and nobody will care.
>>>> Perfect timing.
>>>>
>>> Appeasement for what? Saudi Arabia is a US ally.
>> They also supplied 17 0f the 19 WTC terrorists
>> Probably financed the attack, too.
>>
> You are *such* a kook.
> 
> 
>> Really a safe place for enriched Uranium!
>>
> Isn't the US willing to let North Korea have enriched uranium?

You're throwing that example up to us?

These types of deals *are* appeasement.

Kim Jong-Il doesn't deserve enriched uranium.  The only thing Kim 
Jong-Il deserves is a firing squad.


>> I guess they think they are going to run out of
>> oil, too...elsewise what do they need atomic fuel for?
>>
> They might want the energy so they can sell their oil for a high
> price. There really needs to be a world built out of nuclear power.
> I'm sorry you can't see that, I'm also sorry Americans aren't
> building nuclear power out at home.

You're throwing that example up to us?

If the U.S. can't develop its own alternative energy sources (whether 
it's nuclear or something else), why the heck should America be helping 
Saudi Arabia develop theirs?


-- 
Steven L.
Email:  sdlitvin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 the NOSPAM before replying to me.