Re: obarmy radically changes his stance on iran to get closer to the bush position.....

On Mon, 19 May 2008 08:33:39 -0400, FACE <AFaceInTheCrowd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>From  abelard <abelard3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,  on Mon, 19 May 2008 12:45:20 +0200
>wrote: 
>
>>On Mon, 19 May 2008 05:28:54 -0400, Governor Swill
>><governor.swill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>FACE <AFaceInTheCrowd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> used a stick in the sand to babble
>>>>http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/article/29896_Obama_Changes_His_Unconditional_Position
>>>>Obama Changes His 'Unconditional' Position - Update: Video Added
>>>>
>>>>Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:02:40 pm PST
>>>>
>>>>In yet another New York Times advocacy piece for Barack Obama, we
discover
>>>>that the Obama campaign is trying to rewrite history again.
>>>>
>>>>    Susan E. Rice, a former State Department and National Security
Council
>>>>official who is a foreign policy adviser to the Democratic candidate,
said
>>>>that “for political purposes, Senator Obama’s opponents on the right
have
>>>>distorted and reframed” his views. Mr. McCain and his surrogates have
>>>>repeatedly stated that Mr. Obama would be willing to meet
“unconditionally”
>>>>with Mr. Ahmadinejad. But Dr. Rice said that this was not the case for
Iran
>>>>or any other so-called “rogue” state. Mr. Obama believes “that
engagement at
>>>>the presidential level, at the appropriate time and with the
appropriate
>>>>preparation, can be used to leverage the change we need,” Dr. Rice
said.
>>>>“But nobody said he would initiate contacts at the presidential level;
that
>>>>requires due preparation and advance work.”
>>>>
>>>>The problem is, Barack Obama did say he’d meet with Iran
unconditionally, in
>>>>front of a lot of people, at the CNN/YouTube Democratic debate last
July.
>>>
>>>But the real problem is that this is being twisted to appeasement.
>>>
>>>Swill
>>
>>don't worry swill....he will attack pak if he feels like it...
>>and he will abandon irak of course, if he can.....
>>
>>his appeasement of the rogue state is only a part of his cunning 
>>       3 point 'plan'
>
>As I previously pointed out, the propinquity of the two public televised
>statements that he would meet with Ahmadijihad with no pre-conditions and
>that he would bomb pakistan was very telling of what an immature
politician
>he is -- playing to what he (or his DNC handlers) feel is the current
public
>opinion and practicing damage control.  He apparently has no real
feelings
>of his own except that the world would be mud happy under a balloon man
such
>as himself.  The worse possibility is that he really does possess a
>schema....

he has his advisors/friends to tell him what to do...

he has wright....he has wright's successor...
he has the weatherman and his accomplice....
he has his brainless wife...
he has rezko....

and if they can't work out what to do...they can always hold 
    another rally....

yes they can....yes they can.....yes they can.....


regards

-- 
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics 
 energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 do***ent calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  all that is necessary for       []     walk quietly and carry
  the triumph of evil is that      []           a big stick.
  good people do nothing     []   trust actions not words
                    only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------