lorad474@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> On May 19, 11:25 am, "Steven L." <sdlit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Bill Bonde { ''the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack'')
wrote:
> >
> > > Sid9 wrote:
> > >> "Bill Bonde { ''the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal
attack'')"
> > >> <tributyltinpa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >>news:482F8863.FA2F280@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > >>> "Steven L." wrote:
> >
> > >>>> The perfect gift for a country that already has 22% of the
world's oil
> > >>>> supply: Enriched uranium!
> >
> > >>>> This is a classic case of "Only Nixon Could Go To China."
> >
> > >>>> Obama should thank Bush for making this deal for him. President
Obama
> > >>>> could never get away with it--everybody would say it's
appeasement.
> >
> > >>>> But after Bush's strong speech against appeasement yesterday, he
can
> > >>>> safely send enriched uranium to Saudi Arabia and nobody will
care.
> > >>>> Perfect timing.
> >
> > >>> Appeasement for what? Saudi Arabia is a US ally.
> > >> They also supplied 17 0f the 19 WTC terrorists
> > >> Probably financed the attack, too.
> >
> > > You are *such* a kook.
> >
> > >> Really a safe place for enriched Uranium!
> >
> > > Isn't the US willing to let North Korea have enriched uranium?
> >
> > You're throwing that example up to us?
> >
> > These types of deals *are* appeasement.
> >
> > Kim Jong-Il doesn't deserve enriched uranium. The only thing Kim
> > Jong-Il deserves is a firing squad.
> >
> > >> I guess they think they are going to run out of
> > >> oil, too...elsewise what do they need atomic fuel for?
> >
> > > They might want the energy so they can sell their oil for a high
> > > price. There really needs to be a world built out of nuclear power.
> > > I'm sorry you can't see that, I'm also sorry Americans aren't
> > > building nuclear power out at home.
> >
> > You're throwing that example up to us?
> >
> > If the U.S. can't develop its own alternative energy sources (whether
> > it's nuclear or something else), why the heck should America be
helping
> > Saudi Arabia develop theirs?
>
> Did somone mention 'alternative energy' ?
>
> US gov re****ts the potential of 40 GIGA-watts of energy from northern
> Indiana (which today saw it's first large wind farm go into
> operation)...
>
> Seeing as how Indiana is a rather smallish state.. multiple that by
> 100 to get a working estimate of potential across all of the US..
>
> The answer is 4,000 GIGA-Watts.. or the equivalent of 23,529,411,764
> barrels of oil is one year (!!!!)
>
So your plan is to put windmills on every inch of Indiana? Kook
alert!
> -OR-
>
> The equivalent of three times more than ALL OIL used (7,300,000,000
> bbls) in the US each year. (!!!)
> (someone please check my cyphering)
>
> Screw the saudiis, screw the russians, screw Hugo Chavez, and screw
> the extortionist oil neocons too.
>
How are "neocons" "extortionist oil"?
--
"Question, two men starving to death decide to eat their hair like
spaghetti. Is that funny?"
"Hmmm, well, it depends on if by funny you want to make people
laugh."
-+Eddie Izzard and Joanna Lumley, "The Cat's Meow"
|
