"DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:lqudnabnz7o4bq_VnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> LAWYERS AND CRACKPOTS - AND WHY TO FILE PRO SE
>
>(Ask them for proof of their claims the next time they make such
ludicrous
>claims and watch them scurry for their >rocks). Also, note that all of
the
>Nigel Brooks smear gang's accusations about me have been submitted to a
>team of >independent and highly qualified investigators, experts on
>military issues, and the law. I have already seen some of >their written
>conclusions, and so far all of the experts agree with me, and some
believe
>I am being smeared and >defamed with fraud, false accusations and
obloquy,
>and two have recommended I take immediate legal action. I will >publish
all
>of their opinions about the Nigel Brooks accusations when all of his and
>his gang's false accusations, >forgeries, fraud, false military record
>representations, and general obloquy have been investigated).
Precisely what is defamatory about the observation that on February 16,
2003, in a thread entitled "Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel" at
alt.security.terrorism you said in post number 17 as follows:
"Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart also, and I received mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is
around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart not received in
combat is about as cowardly as it gets."
What is defamatory about the observation that your military records
indicate
that you did not receive a Purple Heart in any war - real or imagined?
What is defamatory about the observation that on June 13, 2002, in a
thread
entitled "Truth Muslim Style", in that same newsgroup, you said :
http://tinyurl.com/5mpopj
"Doug Says: Whatever that means above only you would know. I have a
PhD."
and later
"In addition, if you want to exchange résumé's then I will need to see
yours
first. But to give you a hint, my PhD is in Statistics,"
What is defamatory about the observation that there is absolutely no
record
of anyone with your name being awarded a Doctor of Philosophy Degree in
Statistics by any accredited institution of higher learning in the United
States of America?
What is defamatory about voicing the opinion that your are a liar Mr.
Reiman?
That's my opinion - and my opinion is further reinforced by the fact that
when you posted your questions to the "justanswers" website
http://tinyurl.com/69vrgv
you failed to provide the person giving the
answer, any of the prior statements made in USENET made by either ChipC
or
yourself regarding being wounded. Those prior statements (which I have
referred you to time and time again) were part of the evidence I took into
account when concluding that you and Chip C were indeed claiming to have
been awarded the United States Military award - The Purple Heart for
wounds
received as a result of enemy action.
I am confident - that had EMJ1219 been fully apprized of all of the facts
I
took into account before making my determination as to the meaning of the
referenced post - that he would have reached the same conclusion as I.
I trust this clears up any misunderstanding you might have
Nigel Brooks
|
