Doug, you need to seek out a mental health expert and show them your Usenet
postings. I'm sure you will get the help you need when they see what you
have been doing.
On Tue, 20 May 2008 08:47:31 -0700, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
>
>
>
>© Copyright all materials written by Author DGV Reiman 2008, all rights
>reserved. By posting or publi****ng this article and other copyrighted
>articles on USENET and/or elsewhere, Author is expressly NOT granting
>any implied authorization to reproduce his copyrighted work in any
>manner. The Author further does not accept as "Fair Use" under U.S. Code
>Title 17, nor will condone, the reproduction of any ****tion of his
>copyrighted materials IN ANY MANNER for the purpose of harassing,
>stalking or defaming the Author, or in conjunction with any violation of
>any civil or criminal statutes. Violators will face legal action. If
>anyone wishes to reproduce my copyrighted materials all they need to do
>first is email me and receive back via email my written permission to do
>so - such permission will not be unreasonably withheld. As I have often
>stated, I post copyrighted articles on USENET for a pre-review by the
>public prior to placing those articles in a book to be sold in
>international commerce. All those that read these articles already know
>or should already know my copyrighted articles cannot be infringed upon
>in any manner simply because they were first posted on USENET. Moreover,
>according to case law and expert answers in respect to this issue, the
>general stated policy of newgroups, such as to invite comment, DOES NOT
>preclude, supercede nor abrogate the author's right of copyright
>protection. Moreover, case law has further provided a precedent that
>"Fair Use" cannot be claimed by an infringer to disguise the spiteful
>and defaming reproduction of an author's work.
>
>
>(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all of
>my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
>contem****ary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
>represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
>about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
>those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
>entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
>annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please notify me of
>your specific reasons for annoyance via email at legalcoach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
>"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
>post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
>archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain, and
>to present articles to USENET readers prior to publication to determine
>interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way cause anyone
>emotional harm by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please note that
>defending myself from harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has
>been deemed a "lawful and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel.
>If I am not attacked, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles
>not interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
>respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
>and all ISP's and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site
>or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
>op****tunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
>archive).
>
>IN ADDITION, considering the typical ridiculous, absurd and obviously
>false claims about my military service that originates from Sp4 Nigel
>Brooks and his Brownie crackpot gang, I also hereby certify and attest
>this article is NOT a secret coded message that only Sp4 Nigel Brooks
>can decode with his secret Federal Agent midget decoder and mind reading
>ring. This means Mr. Sp4 Brooks, Mr. Uy Uy's (and their Brownie
>crackpots that echo their every fraud and false accusation) inevitable
>claims that this article is me really claiming in a soothsaying code (a
>code Nigel Brooks and crackpots et al gang can only read of course which
>involves the standard nonsensical Nigel Brooks mind reading claims) that
>(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
>HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam and
>then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member of
>the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
>murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained by
>the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable fangs
>(slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in Vietnam
>and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of all, I went
>to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even before I was
>born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA. Such preposterous Sp4 Nigel Brooks'/Tom Rau and
>crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims about me are, as usual,
>blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask them for proof of their
>claims the next time they make such ludicrous claims and watch them
>scurry for their rocks).
>
>
>
>
>OBAMA THROWS ANOTHER GUTTER BALL
>
>When President Bush said in Israel that people that negotiate with
>terrorists are appeasers and comparable to those fools that tried to
>negotiate with Adolph Hitler, the Barack Hussein Obama political machine
>went into high hysterics in response:
>
>Here is what President Bush actually said:
>
>"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals,
>as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong
>all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks
>crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: "Lord, if
>only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been
>avoided." We have an obligation to call this what it is - the false
>comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by
>history."
>
>The Barak Hussein Obama "south Chicago shuck and jive" political machine
>was quick to respond (no "the US gave Aids to black people" howls and
>barks this time, but similar).
>
>BHO said:
>
>President Bush/John McCain are "FAILURES," HOWL, BARK, WHINE! "THEY MADE
>IRAN MORE POWERFUL," SNARL, GROWL, SHOUT, "ANY DAY ANY PLACE I WILL
>DEBATE MCCAIN ABOUT FOREIGN POLICY" BLUSTER, PUFF, AND ROAR!
>
>"What we need is CHANGE! CHANGE FROM THE BUSH DOCTRINE - WE ARE NOT
>SAFER! WE NEED CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE . . . AND CHANGE! HOWL,
>BLUSTER, SNORT, AND ROAR, SAID BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.
>
>Then one of his "sweeties" in the Press Corps asked him the following
>question:
>
>"Mr. Obama, if after you become President and you could speak with the
>President of Iran, what would you say to him?"
>
>BHO replied with: (I am paraphrasing).
>
>"I would sit down with the President of Iran and offer him incentives to
>(1) stop his nuclear program and to stop his attacks on Israel, and (2)
>stop sup****ting terrorists."
>
>SAY WHAT???? Where in the hell is the "CHANGE" from the Bush policy in
>such a statement?
>
>Has not the Europeans, the Asians, the Girl Scouts, the Egyptians, the
>Saudis, the Modocs, the Martians, all with the backing and sponsor****p
>of the United States and the United Nations ALL offered that very same
>precise offer to Iran about ten thousand times so far and counting? OF
>COURSE THEY HAVE! And what has Iran done in response? Thumbed noses at
>all offers, said they were increasing their nuclear weapons' program,
>again vowed to wipe Israel off the map, and increased their training and
>sup****t of terrorists murdering Americans and civilians in both Iraq and
>in Afghanistan.
>
>
>
>So BHO calls "change" a simple repeat of the Bush doctrine and tactics
>with Iran? You have got to be kidding!
>
>
>
>With all the hype and shucking and jiving about Barack Hussein Obama
>coming from his sup****ters I was sure I would hear some incredibly
>insightful revelation, some mind enhancing epiphanies, some high
>philosophical insight that would be wondrous and mind moving to behold
>and would, in its forced epiphany on the President of Iran, convince the
>Iranians to bow their heads in shame, shed a tear for their past evil
>deeds, and turn a new leaf praising Barack Hussein Obama's genius while
>all the time asking the world; "can't we just get along?"
>
>But no, just like in the Wizard of Oz, it seems there is a little man
>behind the curtain pulling the levers and blowing all the smoke and
>howls. And this little man behind the curtain blowing all the smoke
>knows no more than President Bush, and has no more insight on how to
>stop Iran than his mentor and close political advisor for twenty years;
>the Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
>
>Talking with the Animals
>
>When you talk or negociate directly with terrorists you provide them
>with credibility - you convince their population their tactics are
>winning, and the President of the United States, hat in hand, has come
>begging for Iran to stop puni****ng the USA for its evil deeds against
>Allah.
>
>The day BHO sits down with Mahmound Ahmadinejad and whines for peace,
>the radical Muslim Mosques' throughout the Muslim world will all
>proclaim victory, and will thereby, recruit more suicide bombers,
>insurgents, money and financing such as the world has never seen before.
>
>
>
>BHO clearly suffers a delusion that Iran actually wants to avoid war
>with Israel and the USA, and nothing could be further from the truth.
>Iran is building nuclear weapons to give them to its various terrorist
>factions it controls, such as Haamas, the Palestinians, the Jerusalem
>Brigade, the ****ite Militias, and of course Al Qaida. All of those
>Iranian backed terrorist organizations have sworn to destroy Israel and
>the USA or die in the process - and there are hundreds of thousands of
>them ready to "die for Allah."
>
>BHO also seems to suffer the self-serving delusion that if our Congress
>had not approved the liberation of Iraq and the removal of Saddam the
>radical Muslim insurgents and terrorists would have not entered
>Afghanistan in the same force as they entered Iraq. The BHO crowd wants
>the world to believe that Afghanistan is a "good war" and Iraq "is a bad
>war." Yet ask any General, or other expert on this issue, and they will
>tell you that both Afghanistan and Iraq are the same war! Had we not
>liberated Iraq our forces would be fighting the same amount of
>terrorists in Afghanistan as we are now fighting in Iraq. Only then we
>also would have a hostile Saddam Hussein and his Republican Guard Army
>on our flanks, and Saddam would have been helping to train and finance
>even more terrorists and insurgents for entry into Afghanistan.
>
>Nothing in the world short of pre-emptive military strikes, or the
>complete covert overthrow of the Iranian theocracy, is going to stop
>Iran from producing nuclear weapons and giving them to their terrorist
>militias. Sitting down and having tea with these monsters is NOT the
>answer - a good and effective bombing mission is the only answer at this
>point in time - and if Mr. Binyamin Netanyahu is elected Prime Minister
>in Israel I suspect that is precisely what is going to happen - then
>what will BHO do? Offer more "Tea and Crumpets" to our enemies as the
>bombs start to fly?
>
>Where in the hell do these dregs and idiots come from that would be King
>of America? South Chicago? Peanut Farms? Please, wasn't one Jimmy Carter
>enough?
>
>Doug Grant (Tm)
>
>"Troll #327" <leonard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:dv9v241cq2no3cvbejbtc0joktu7u44a0u@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sat, 17 May 2008 12:01:24 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>Snip copyright violations and cyberstalking, harassment, false
>accusations and forged FBI re****ts.
>
>Messrs: Stevel/Paul Carrier/Dennis McDonnell, including all other false
>names you may use, you are hereby once again notified to cease and
>desist your cyberstalking such as reposting forged FBI do***ents about
>me, and cease and desist your intentional copyright infringements and
>violations or face legal action.
>
>Spam?
>I find it amazing the smear gang gang members would (1) violate my
>copyrights, and (2) reply to a post leaving the title intact and then
>complain about the contents of the original post being in the post when
>I reply to their spam. It seems they are deliberately causing my posts
>to be repeated several times as Giganews has authorized me to replace
>the original post contents whenever it is snipped out and the title line
>is deliberately allowed to remain intact. (That is the way smear
>merchant hide facts that prove they are lying - it is a common practice
>for smear gangs I am told).
>
>Of course Giganews and lawyers, and law enforcement are wise to the
>tactics of smear merchants.
>
>Even the smear merchants must realize a reply to a post is not another
>repeated initiated post? So why are they repeating my posts twenty or
>thirty times and then howling spam when I reply to their repeats? Are
>they trying to fraudulently claim I am the one repeating the posts they
>in fact are repeating when I reply to their spam? Naw, no one is *that*
>stupid. It is clear the smear gang resorts to snipping out entire post
>contents and leaving the title line intact so as to (1) hide the post
>and (2) hide the fact that one of their gang members has been
>irrefutably proved a liar and a fraud merchant. Then of course when I
>reply and replace the original post so people will understand what the
>title line is about, they try to defraud the readers by claiming I
>simply repeated the same post twenty or thirty times - which anyone that
>can read headers can easily see that claim is a complete fraud. If it
>is not this Repeating Spam fraud they are using when they know the facts
>I present cannot be refuted, then it is the fake Kook votes they claim
>happened but never did.
>
>It appears to me that anytime I defend myself from one of NIgel Brooks
>or Tom Rau's outright frauds, false accusations, forgeries and obloquy,
>with a truthful rebuttal, their smear gang members come out of the
>woodwork and try to hide or distort my proof those smear merchants have
>been caught lying and using false accusations. Some of the gang members
>even used the same fake names, and traded off using the same fake name
>several times while they were repeating my posts. They repeat my posts,
>then blame me for doing so, which is of course typical smear merchant
>fraud, but it is so transparent they certainly cannot believe someone
>would not see what is going on? Are they *really* as stupid as they
>sound?
>
>Doug Grant (Tm)
>
>
>
>
>
|
