Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL

"DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:3Pidne0vi5Lw2KjVnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Nigel Brooks" <nbrooks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:69k6pgF31og69U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:c_udnTpO9pE4QqnVnZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "Mac" <NoSpamToday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:eec734phnnd6qc3v8kl07t2ulfpdkdvgkb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 15:41:11 -0400, Sharky <sharky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Messrs: Stevel/Paul Carrier/Dennis McDonnell, including all other
false
>>>>>names you may use, you are hereby once again notified to cease and
>>>>>desist your cyberstalking such as reposting forged FBI do***ents
about
>>>>>me, and cease and desist your intentional copyright infringements and
>>>>>violations or face legal action.
>>>>
>>>> ==========               ====
>>>> Go pound sand...
>>>> Apparently you have had a relapse.
>>>> Once again you are claiming that several different people are one
>>>> person.
>>>> When next you talk to those  "legal-experts"  to whom you present a
>>>> very one-sided, biased discussion,  ask them to help you read simple
>>>> HEADERS....
>>>> Jeez!
>>>> --Mac
>>>
>>> Doug's Rebuttal:
>>>
>>> Mr. McDonnell, are you claiming that you have not posted under fake 
>>> names in respect to posts about or directed to me?  BWHAHAHAHAHAHA.
>>>
>>> Moreover, you were already offered the op****tunity to provide any and 
>>> all evidence you wished to present to the INDEPENDENT legal and
military 
>>> experts I have retained to justify your volumes of false accusations 
>>> about me and my service.  So far you have ignored that offer and
snipped 
>>> it out of your replies.
>>>
>>> If you post your evidence to back up your accusations about me you can

>>> be sure the experts will receive it and will consider it before they 
>>> render an opinion,  and they  will reconsider their opinion if they
have 
>>> already rendered an opinion, especially if the evidence is new.
>>>
>>> They are NOT going to get involved with a gang of smear merchants on 
>>> USENET that are not interested in the truth, and use several fake
names 
>>> to further their fraud and cyberstalking.  But they will read all
sides 
>>> of an issue before they render their opinion.  Obviously your claim of

>>> me presenting them with a biased discussion is a lie, if you disagree,

>>> please provide your evidence.
>>>
>>> Those experts have a reputation, they will not lie for you nor for me.

>>> They are interested in facts and evidence, which is what I am also 
>>> interested in.  The days of smear gangs' lying and then sup****ting
those 
>>> lies with volumes of fake named posts to smear and defame their
targeted 
>>> victims are over.  However, I must warn you that if you attempt to 
>>> falsify evidence, or lie about me or such evidence, such fraud could
be 
>>> used against you in a court of law when these experts testify.
>>>
>>> Time to walk the walk Mr. McDonnell.  I have replied to you only to 
>>> again offer you the op****tunity to provide your evidence to sup****t
your 
>>> accusations about me if you have any.  If not, then I will assume you 
>>> are simply deliberately lying.
>>>
>>> Moreover, since you and your "friends" have often repeated the fraud
Tom 
>>> Rau has posted about me, I suggest you read the following rebuttal to 
>>> Mr. Rau's lies before you dream up some more false accusations about
me.
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/447mjw
>>>
>>>
>>> Doug Grant (Tm)
>>>
>>
>> Mr. Reimans experts (COD):
>>
>>
http://law.justanswer.com/questions/15ukz-usenet-libel-defamation-question
>>
>> http://military-law.justanswer.com/questions/13ytr-searching-person
>>
>> -- 
>> Nigel Brooks
>
> Doug Says:  Mr. Brooks I have used experts on that forum and other
experts 
> as well not on that forum.  The experts that will testify in court and
the 
> ones I am using primarily are not of that forum.  However, if you wish
to 
> use the retired First Sergeant as a reviewing expert in respect to your 
> claims, I will be glad to consult him again.  Do you have any new
evidence 
> to back up your accusations about me?  If you do please present it and I

> will present him with your evidence and my rebuttal, and we shall let
the 
> chips fall where they may.
>
> Doug Grant (Tm)
>

You are joking right?

Do you really expect that I would trust you to provide Ed with the 
information that I utilized in arriving at my conclusions?

Tell you what -  I will present my the information that I utilized in 
arriving at the conclusion you have lied - at the appropriate time and
place 
of my choosing.

I feel confident that given all of the facts - your "experts" will agree 
with me.

Nigel Brooks