Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Politics > Re: Experts wan...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 36 of 68 Topic 330620 of 379263
Post > Topic >>

Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL

by Troll #327 <leonard@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 22, 2008 at 10:42 AM

On Thu, 22 May 2008 12:15:36 +0100, SteveL
<stevelon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Thu, 22 May 2008 03:11:08 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
><dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mac" <NoSpamToday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:eec734phnnd6qc3v8kl07t2ulfpdkdvgkb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 15:41:11 -0400, Sharky <sharky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Messrs: Stevel/Paul Carrier/Dennis McDonnell, including all other
>>>>false
>>>>names you may use, you are hereby once again notified to cease and
>>>>desist your cyberstalking such as reposting forged FBI do***ents about
>>>>me, and cease and desist your intentional copyright infringements and
>>>>violations or face legal action.
>>>
>>> ==========               ====
>>> Go pound sand...
>>> Apparently you have had a relapse.
>>> Once again you are claiming that several different people are one
>>> person.
>>> When next you talk to those  "legal-experts"  to whom you present a
>>> very one-sided, biased discussion,  ask them to help you read simple
>>> HEADERS....
>>> Jeez!
>>> --Mac
>>
>>Doug's Rebuttal:
>>
>>Mr. McDonnell, are you claiming that you have not posted under fake
>>names in respect to posts about or directed to me?  BWHAHAHAHAHAHA.
>>
>>Moreover, you were already offered the op****tunity to provide any and
>>all evidence you wished to present to the INDEPENDENT legal and military
>>experts I have retained to justify your volumes of false accusations
>>about me and my service.  So far you have ignored that offer and snipped
>>it out of your replies.
>
>Doug. They are not "independent" if you control access to them. Do you
>really not see that?
>
>>
>>If you post your evidence to back up your accusations about me you can
>>be sure the experts will receive it and will consider it before they
>>render an opinion,  and they  will reconsider their opinion if they have
>>already rendered an opinion, especially if the evidence is new.
>>
>> They are NOT going to get involved with a gang of smear merchants on
>>USENET that are not interested in the truth, and use several fake names
>>to further their fraud and cyberstalking. 
>
>Since that is exactly what they are expected to arbitrate on, your
>claim that they will not become "involved" is classic Begging the
>Question illogical insanity.
>
>Are you happy demonstrating your stupidity in every post?
>
>
>> But they will read all sides
>>of an issue before they render their opinion.
>
>Given that what they have seen so far of "our side" is your bizarre
>renditions of the "gangs" posts  and most definitely not the posts
>themselves I very much doubt they will ever see all sides.
>
>>  Obviously your claim of
>>me presenting them with a biased discussion is a lie, if you disagree,
>>please provide your evidence.
>
>Who to? Give me their contact details.
>
>>
>>Those experts have a reputation, they will not lie for you nor for me.
>
>Not knowingly. But having seen the pack of lies you presented to the
>experts on the web-site I have little confidence you would tell the
>other supposed experts anything different.
>
><snip>
>>
>>
>>"Mac" <NoSpamToday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>news:scq934dsv28u97f95d4jste1eiq22jntn2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Wed, 21 May 2008 19:51:13 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
>>> <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Mac" <NoSpamToday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:eec734phnnd6qc3v8kl07t2ulfpdkdvgkb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 15:41:11 -0400, Sharky <sharky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>
>>> *************************************************
>>> From the manner in which you headed your assinine epistle, you are
>>> claiming that I am "Steve", that I am "Paul Carrier", etc., etc., etc.
>>
>>Doug Says:  No, your conclusion in that regard is false and idiotic.  I 
>>made no such claim.  I believe that you and Mr. Carrier and SteveL are 
>>all different people
>
>On the contrary Doug I have numerous examples of you going off half
>cocked and claiming that I am MAC, MAC is me, I am tankfixer,
>tankfixer is me etc.
>
>Care to apologize for your earlier false accusations?


Actually, I am MAC and tankfixer.  No not tankfixer I guess he's in the
US.
Well then I just have to be SteveL, then maybe not.  Could it be that
Nigel is
Nigel, MAC is MAC, Tankfixer is Tankfixer, SteveL IS really SteveL and I
am
Troll #327???

Who would'a thunk it?
 




 68 Posts in Topic:
ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-16 12:26:47 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-16 18:57:38 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-17 12:01:24 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-17 20:53:34 
Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-20 08:47:31 
Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-20 10:36:40 
Re: Spam
Dai Uy <Dai-Uy@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 09:08:02 
Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Sharky <sharky@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 15:41:11 
Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Mac <NoSpamToday@[EMAI  2008-05-21 05:25:35 
Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-21 00:25:05 
Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Sharky <sharky@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 16:17:27 
Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Mac <NoSpamToday@[EMAI  2008-05-21 21:54:52 
Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Sharky <shark@[EMAIL P  2008-05-24 09:52:27 
Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHER B-
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-21 19:51:13 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"Nigel Brooks"   2008-05-21 22:14:51 
Balsa Gavel Winner Continues kOOksUIt Harassment!! Re: Experts w
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-21 20:48:31 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-22 03:05:27 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
SteveL <stevelon@[EMAI  2008-05-22 12:00:54 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-22 07:22:57 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"Nigel Brooks"   2008-05-22 09:31:12 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-22 16:33:41 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"Nigel Brooks"   2008-05-22 20:11:19 
Nigel's new evidence for Experts and My rebuttal
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-23 20:09:48 
Re: Nigel's new evidence for Experts and My rebuttal
"Pepperoni" <  2008-05-23 23:43:08 
Offer to Huxton to Walk the Walk (was Re: Nigel's new evidence
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-24 10:39:32 
Re: Offer to Huxton to Walk the Walk (was Re: Nigel's new evide
"Pepperoni" <  2008-05-24 14:05:07 
Doug moving to Tin Foil Land, invest in stock NOW !
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-26 20:13:21 
Re: Doug moving to Tin Foil Land, invest in stock NOW !
SteveL <stevelon@[EMAI  2008-05-27 05:25:50 
Re: Doug moving to Tin Foil Land, invest in stock NOW !
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-26 21:38:52 
Re: Doug moving to Tin Foil Land, invest in stock NOW !
SteveL <stevelon@[EMAI  2008-05-29 05:35:12 
Re: Doug moving to Tin Foil Land, invest in stock NOW !
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-29 07:22:43 
Re: Nigel's new evidence for Experts and My rebuttal
"Nigel Brooks"   2008-05-24 12:30:14 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Mac <NoSpamToday@[EMAI  2008-05-22 03:37:34 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-22 03:11:08 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
SteveL <stevelon@[EMAI  2008-05-22 12:15:36 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-22 10:42:01 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-22 07:23:47 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Mac <NoSpamToday@[EMAI  2008-05-22 21:06:40 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-22 16:11:15 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-22 16:19:28 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Doug
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-22 18:40:46 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Mac <NoSpamToday@[EMAI  2008-05-23 07:27:56 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-21 20:46:00 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Doug
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-21 21:16:46 
Doogies Musings with the FBI
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-22 14:25:34 
Hot off the Press Doogie Call the FBI Again
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-22 15:10:29 
Re: Hot off the Press Doogie Call the FBI Again
"Armenian War Librar  2008-05-22 17:09:04 
Re: Hot off the Press Doogie Call the FBI Again
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-23 09:25:19 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"Jack G." <j  2008-05-23 14:02:42 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-23 15:36:36 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"Jack G." <j  2008-05-23 06:53:24 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-23 07:19:20 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-23 18:58:13 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-26 21:12:48 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-23 09:39:10 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-23 19:00:49 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-27 23:51:50 
I'll Have a Doogie Melt With the Chili-LOON Fries and a kOOk Sha
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-28 00:05:57 
Doug's Spam
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-20 17:58:31 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
"Jack G." <j  2008-05-22 16:41:40 
Re: Experts want Evidence from Gang (was Re: Spam was Re: ANOTHE
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-22 17:30:06 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Sharky <shark@[EMAIL P  2008-05-16 22:34:27 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-17 12:04:46 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Danzig <tyatcak@[EMAIL  2008-05-20 23:35:08 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
"robw" <nodd  2008-05-20 20:00:45 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Danzig <tyatcak@[EMAIL  2008-05-29 19:22:22 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
"DGVREIMAN" <  2008-05-17 12:11:30 
Re: ANOTHER B-HUSSEIN-OBAMA GUTTER BALL
Troll #327 <leonard@[E  2008-05-17 20:57:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 6:27:08 CST 2008.