"DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:6sGdnVVEJutLz6XVnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> If you disagree with any of my rebuttal above, and wish to provide
>>> evidence anything I said is wrong or incorrect or misleading, then
>>> please do so before May 30, 2008, as that weekend I will resubmit your
>>> claims and new evidence and my rebuttal and proof of it to the expert
>>> for his review and opinion.
>>
>>
>> Well, yeah; I'm glad you asked.
>>
>> Chip's reference to having a "CAR" obviously referred to a Combat
Action
>> Ribbon.
>> You could submit the original post and your "rewrite" to your expert
for
>> comparison. To Me, the meaning and intent of *both* posts is clear,
>> obvious and simply evident to an average reader. For convenience, I
>> present both posts side-by-side.
>> http://tinyurl.com/4sd8ob
>>
>> Over the years you have misrepresented your awards, time in service,
time
>> in country, and "eye witness" accounts. I am not surprised that the
>> average reader would doubt your veracity on any *fact* that you would
>> claim or present.
>>
>> Pepperoni
> Mr. Huxton
> Doug's Rebuttal to the Fraud and False accusations posted by Mr. Huxton:
>
> First, Chip does not have a Combat Action Ribbon so your claim that was
> his reference was something that I nor my typist could have ever known.
> You claim you have read his mind and you know he was claiming something
he
> did not have and said and confirmed he did not have? BWHAHAHAHA. Well,
> mind reader, read my mind right now, at what degree do I find
contemptible
> and unethical your false and fraudulent claims about me? From 1-10, with
> ten being the highest possible contempt and disgust for someone like
you,
> please, mind reader, which number am I thinking right now? (If you are
> going to claim mind reading you might as well be prepared to provide
some
> demonstrations of your mind reading skills).
>
> The truth of the matter is it does not matter what Chip was thinking
when
> he wrote his post, what matters is what my typist thought he was
> referencing when she read his post to me. And as far as she was
concerned
> he was trying to talk about Cards and not Medals as she nor I had ever
> heard of a Car. . And of course this fact is clearly evidenced by the
> last sentence of my typist's reply when she says he is claiming a purple
> heart not awarded in combat, and we all know that a purple heart medal
> MUST be awarded in Combat. The only possible Purple Heart anything that
> she could have been referencing that was not awarded in combat was the
> Purple Heart Card that was issued by the VA at that time for service
> connected disabilities.
>
> Even the original erred post proves irrefutably she was not referencing
> purple heart medals and experts have already agreed that fact is obvious
-
> and your posting history proves you are a smear merchant that regularly
> uses fraud, false accusations and forgeries to smear and defame, so I am
> sure the "average reader" would find your self-serving conclusions and
> preposterous claims just as fraudulent and deliberately defaming as I
and
> the independent experts find them.
>
> Mr. Huxton, your fraud and false accusations above are a complete lie
and
> falsehood and you know it. You and your smear gang members have been
> caught several times conning the group with such fraud and false
> accusations, and you have been told to cease and desist your
cyberstalking
> and false accusations several times. I hope you abide by this notice to
> do so and do not require me to take legal action against you in Michigan
> or elsewhere. However, since I have offered all smear gang members
which
> of course you are a leading member to provide evidence of their
> accusations about me and I will provide that evidence and my rebuttal
> evidence to highly respected third party experts on the law and on
> military service, I will extend this same offer to you this one time.
>
> Time to walk the walk Mr. Huxton. If you believe you have evidence of
> your ridiculous and obviously false accusations above, post the evidence
> or admit you are lying, one or the other.
>
> Moreover, to juxtapose a post that was removed for error with its
> corrected post, and then claim the post removed for error was the
> intentional post and the corrected copy was not, is beyond rational
> understanding even for a smear merchant. No one is stupid enough to
> believe that nonsense - anyone rational that is.
>
> Moreover, retrieving/hacking/using code to hack/ and then reposting a
post
> from my waste basket which was removed from USENET due to error by
Google
> and authenticated as removed for that error by Google, represents
> malicious interference in my computer processes and Google's services.
and
> becuase two or more are involved in this hacking, represents a
conspiracy,
> I strongly suggest you stop digging posts out of my waste basket and
> reproducing them and trying to pan off those discarded and erred posts
as
> intentional or accurate. You will look less like a fraud merchant if
you
> do, and you also will not be conspiring to maliciously interfere with
> Google's processes and my computer systems. Cease and desist such
> malicious interference Mr. Huxton and immediately and cease and desist
> your conspiracy with other gang members to perpetrate such overt acts.
> This issue will probably go to the legal mat with SteveL Mr. Huxton, and
> if you want to be involved with him then you are a bigger fool that I
> thought (if that is possible). But your call, you have been notified to
> cease and desist.
>
> However, with that said, I will await some evidence of your false and
> clearly fraudulent claims about my "misrepresentations" above. I won't
> however, hold my breath, as the last thing any fraud merchant has is
> "evidence" to back up his fraud accusations.
>
> This will be my last response and rebuttal to your fraud unless you
> provide some evidence to back up your claims.
>
> Doug Grant (Tm)
You are a fraud and compulsive liar, Doug. Any extant "evidence" is
contained in your own posts and archived for review by anyone. Such
evidence should be sufficient to resolve any spurious kooksoot you can
present.
http://tinyurl.com/4sd8ob
Pepperoni
|
