"DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:9LWdnQwnp9wdSqrVnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Nigel Brooks" <nbrooks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:69gdf8F32gj1sU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:lqudnabnz7o4bq_VnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> LAWYERS AND CRACKPOTS - AND WHY TO FILE PRO SE
>> What is defamatory about the observation that on June 13, 2002, in a
>> thread entitled "Truth Muslim Style", in that same newsgroup, you said
:
>> http://tinyurl.com/5mpopj
>>
>> "Doug Says: Whatever that means above only you would know. I have a
>> PhD."
>>
>> and later
>>
>> "In addition, if you want to exchange résumé's then I will need to see
>> yours first. But to give you a hint, my PhD is in Statistics,"
>>
>> What is defamatory about the observation that there is absolutely no
>> record of anyone with your name being awarded a Doctor of Philosophy
>> Degree in Statistics by any accredited institution of higher learning
in
>> the United States of America?
> Doug Says: Mr. Brooks, I have already posted several times that Ph.D
was
> honorary. You knew this, yet claim you searched for non-honorary
degrees,
> your intent was of course not to find a degree then complain about it.
>
> I was awarded an honorary Ph.D by the only entity that could award such
an
> honor in the State it was awarded. The Honorary was awarded by a
college
> licenced and authorized by the state to provide gaming instruction for
my
> systicial analysis of something known as "floating zones" which
> revolutionized card counting methods. If you still disagree I received
> this award, then provide your evidence to the contrary and I will
provide
> yours and mine to the expert.
So are you telling one and all that the "Doug Grant College of Winning
Blackjack Inc or the Doug Grant Gaming Colledge Inc (New Jersey #
0100364736
and 0100206948) conferred an honorary Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics?
That's hilarious Mr. Reiman!!! You gave yourself a degree.
No wonder you didn't provide that information to your opponent in the
original argument. You could have just thrown it in with the "fought in
South America for the United States Army" comment and the Delta Force
inference.
Doug Says: "Whatever that means above only you would know. I have a
PhD."
David Snedeker: Doug Interesting. And you "served" in South America with
what organization? When? In which
countries? And you speak 5 languages? Which ones Doug? And you have a
Ph.D.? In what? From where? When conferred?
Doug Says: Doug Says: My claim of expertise in respect to South America
is
that I lived there, and fought there for the United States Army. "
"In addition, if you want to exchange résumé's then I will need to see
yours
first. But to give you a hint, my PhD is in Statistics,"
Dave Snedeker: "And Doug? Just where in South America did you fight as a
member of the US Army? We all want to hear you talk your way out of that
boast. "
Doug Says: " Dave, unless you are really the drooling fool you appear to
be,
you can find out where the US Army stationed Delta Team members throughout
a
very long period of time. The US Army has had troops in South America for
about 50 years. Now if you are an American, you would know that. But
clearly you are not an
American, at least not a real one. "
"Now if you want to know details of my assignments in the US Military, I
can tell you where I was, but not exactly what I did. That information is
classified. "
|
