In article <VOydnbYYwOWq66rVnZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> "tankfixer" <paul.carrier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:MPG.22a0724166e37043989761@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <74fd5ab3-6b00-4337-bcf0-7edd6ee58193
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, jgranade@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> > On May 22, 5:30 pm, Troll #327 <leon...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 22 May 2008 16:41:40 -0700 (PDT), "Jack G."
> > > <jgran...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >On May 22, 4:19 pm, Troll #327 <leon...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >> On Thu, 22 May 2008 16:11:15 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
> > > >> <dgvrei...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> >"Mac" <NoSpamTo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > >> >news:bnnb345kqqs13rvncbesntq1hdbuv5lnik@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> >> On Thu, 22 May 2008 03:11:08 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
> > > >> >> <dgvrei...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> >>>Messrs: Stevel/Paul Carrier/Dennis McDonnell, including all
> > > >> >>>other
> > > >> >>>false names you may use, you are hereby once again notified to
> > > >> >>>cease
> > > >> >>>and
> > > >> >>>desist your cyberstalking such as reposting forged FBI
> > > >> >>>do***ents about
> > > >> >>>me, and cease and desist your intentional copyright
> > > >> >>>infringements and
> > > >> >>>violations or face legal action.
> > > >> >> *****************************************
> > >
> > > >> >>> From the manner in which you headed your assinine epistle,
> > > >> >>> you are
> > > >> >>> claiming that I am "Steve", that I am "Paul Carrier", etc.,
> > > >> >>> etc.,
> > > >> >>> etc.
> > >
> > > >> >> ========== ========
> > > >> >> Doug Says: That is a false and idiotic conclusion. You and
> > > >> >> those people conspire together to cyberstalk and defame.
> ...
> > >
> > > >Your pathetic post make Doug look normal. Go back under the bridge
> > > >with the other trolls.
> > >
> > > From the looks of the rest of your posts Jack, you live in a little
> > > different
> > > but similar dream world than Doogie. Perhaps it is time you made
> > > that phone
> > > call that Doogie has been neglecting. The VA is getting better
> > > despite the
> > > start lack of funds in the psychiatric sup****t departments. There
> > > are VA
> > > facilities nationwide and should be one in your neighborhood. The
> > > links posted
> > > for the VA work just as well for you as for Doogie kOOkmAn Grant.
> >
> > Anyone who treats a fellow veteran the way you do does not get my
> > respect. You are the sick one.
>
> Paul Carrier said:
>
> I would invite you to research Mr Reiman's USENET posting and his real
> world antics a bit and then re*****s your evaluation of who is sick.
>
>
> Doug Says: Please Jack, Google research what I said in an
> autobiographical context and NOT the thousands of fraud, false
> accusations, forgeries and preposterous false misrepresentations the
> smear gang has posted about me. That is how this fraud and smear gang
> works, they post lies, fraud false accusations distortions then ask
> people to read them as if they were true. Yet of course nothing could
> be further from the truth.
Make sure you search for his posts on your own Jack, I'd not expect you
to take my or Doug's word for things.
>
> If a real veteran wants information about my service, I have a standing
> offer to email me for details and evidence. The smear gang is not, of
> course, interested in the truth, they are just interested in defaming
> and smearing specific targeted victims. And they do not like it when
> that victim responds with the truth, or notifies them to cease and
> desist or face legal action. That puts them on the spot, reveals they
> are serial liars and fraud, and certainly will convince any court that
> the victim tried his best to stop their fraud, obloquy, harassment and
> cyberstalking by every means prior to resorting to the courts to do so.
Only a fool would contact you directly Mr Reiman.
>
> This crackpot is not a Vietnam veteran, he does not have a clue, but he
> tries to ****tray himself as a real veteran, but his cyberstalking and
> fraud are obvious to any rational person.
I'm curious Doug, do you consider only Vietnam vets to be "real
veterans" ?
> What I have done lately is
> take all of my posts about my military service, absent typos, to
> impendent experts on the military and the law, and provide them also
> with what the gang has said about me, and asked them for an independent
> opinion. So far EVERY EXPERT has agreed with me and has indicated they
> believe the gang is dishonest. I am still in the process of doing this
> and I am also using one LTC that actually commanded SRF in Vietnam as a
> potential expert. Once I am through with all of the posts and
> questions, I will post the questions, what I posted to them, and their
> answers. I have asked members of the smear gang to add any additional
> evidence they might have to back up their accusations about me, the only
> one that has complied so far was Nigel Brooks, and his "additional
> evidence" will be submitted to an expert this week to see if it causes
> him to reverse his previous conclusion. (Since Brooks evidence was
> completely irrelevant to the issue I doubt if it will be even
> considered - but you never know).
You have spoon fed only what you wish them to see.
If those experts did their own research of yoru posts and your threats
they would have the full picture.
>
> When this process is complete, then I will publish the facts about the
> gangs false accusations, and of course, that will expose their fraud for
> what I know it is and always has been.
>
> Up to now smear and con men fraud merchants have got away with their
> lies, fraud and cyberstalking as they gang up and use volume to dissuade
> people from defending themselves with independent expert opinions and
> the courts. All that is about to change. Even giganews has responded
> and has identified gang stalking and its detrimental consequences.
>
> In fact the Federal Government recently indicted a woman on Federal
> Conspiracy charges because there were two or more people involved in a
> cyberstalking crime. And now 48 states have laws against cyberstalking.
> It is just a matter of time before cyberstalking gangs are brought to
> justice. And I never quit defending myself, so the time will come.
Just remmeber that lying to the judge is very bad Doug....
--
"Oh Norman, listen! The loons are calling!"
- Katherine Hepburn, "On Golden Pond"
|
