WAR STORIES THREE -ARTICLE 02
The Folks Who Continue To Sup****t the War
© Copyright all materials written by Author DGV Reiman 2008, all rights
reserved. By posting or publi****ng this article and other copyrighted
articles on USENET and/or elsewhere, Author is expressly NOT granting
any implied authorization to reproduce his copyrighted work in any
manner. The Author further does not accept as "Fair Use" under U.S. Code
Title 17, nor will condone, the reproduction of any ****tion of his
copyrighted materials IN ANY MANNER for the purpose of harassing,
stalking or defaming the Author, or in conjunction with any violation of
any civil or criminal statutes. Violators will face legal action. If
anyone wishes to reproduce my copyrighted materials all they need to do
first is email me and receive back via email my written permission to do
so - such permission will not be unreasonably withheld. As I have often
stated, I post copyrighted articles on USENET for a pre-review by the
public prior to placing those articles in a book to be sold in
international commerce. All those that read these articles already know
or should already know my copyrighted articles cannot be infringed upon
in any manner simply because they were first posted on USENET. Moreover,
according to case law and expert answers in respect to this issue, the
general stated policy of newsgroups, such as to invite comment, DOES NOT
preclude, supercede nor abrogate the author's right of copyright
protection. Moreover, case law has further provided a precedent that
"Fair Use" cannot be claimed by an infringer to disguise the spiteful
and defaming reproduction of an author's work.
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all of
my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contem****ary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please notify me of
your specific reasons for annoyance via email at legalcoach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain, and
to present articles to USENET readers prior to publication to determine
interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way cause anyone
emotional harm by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please note that
defending myself from harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has
been deemed a "lawful and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel.
If I am not attacked, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles
not interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP's and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site
or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
op****tunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
IN ADDITION, considering the typical ridiculous, absurd and obviously
false claims about my military service that originates from the smear
merchant crackpot gang, I also hereby certify and attest this article is
NOT a secret coded message that only smear gang members such as the
anonymous cyberstalker SteveL and others can decode with his secret
Federal Agent midget decoder and mind reading ring. This means all gang
members inevitable claims that this article is me really claiming in a
soothsaying code (a code crackpots et al gang members can only read of
course which involves the standard nonsensical gang leader mind reading
claims) that (1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho
Chi Minh, HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in
Vietnam and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret
member of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted
down and murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was
trained by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and
retractable fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after
my deeds in Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and
best of all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics
even before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA. Such preposterous crackpot et
al smear and fraud gang claims about me are, as usual, blatantly false
and equally ridiculous. (Ask them for proof of their claims the next
time they make such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their
rocks). Also, note that all of the smear gang's accusations about me
have been (or will be) submitted to a team of independent and highly
qualified investigators, experts on military issues, and the law. I have
already seen some of their written conclusions, and so far all of the
experts agree with me, and some believe I am being smeared and defamed
with fraud, false accusations and obloquy, and two have recommended I
take immediate legal action against members of this smear gang that
conspires together to defame and smear me on a repeated and regular
basis. I will publish all of their opinions about the gang's accusations
when all of their false accusations, forgeries, fraud, false military
record representations, and general obloquy have been investigated and
opined upon by experts).
The Folks Who Continue To Sup****t the War
All wars, at one time or another, are a "mess." Yet they still need to
be fought and won. If you read the Congressional approval to remove
Saddam by force, both in the Iraqi Liberation Act passed in 1998, and
the subsequent resolution passed in October 2002, you will note the
reasons we chose to liberate Iraq were and are not only logical, but
essential to the welfare of our nation in the future. (All wars are
usually fought from blunder to blunder - such as how we fought our WWII,
but that is the true nature of War).
Instead of simply reviewing the present-day issues and polls driven by
out-of-context news re****ting and child like "if we just lay down our
arms our enemies will do the same" Cindy Sheehan type naiveté we must
look to the future:
Had we remained on the sidelines in respect to Iraq and Afghanistan how
much would our nation suffer in twenty years as the oil rich maniacs
amassed greater quantities and more deadly WMD? Moreover, if we ever
needed to address the Iranian threat, where could we base our troops in
respect to an attack on Iran? Kuwait had already said no, so did Turkey,
and forget Saudi Arabia or Cuter.
It would have been and would be today a major military blunder to attack
the nest of Islamic terrorists in Iran with a hostile Saddam on our
flank - and no where in the area to gain any basing or logistical
sup****t authority for our troops. We need permanent bases in the middle
east, and a logistical avenue to them. Saddam had to fall. The rest of
the infighting in Iraq is just more of a battle against Al Qaeda, with
the Iraqi army as our allies instead of allied to Al Qaeda.
The Irony is for once we elected a President that ignored the polls and
did what was right to protect our nation. Yet due to that selfless act
many foolish American people are now condemning not only perhaps one of
the greatest Presidents we have ever elected, but also the very acts
that have kept use safe from terrorist attacks for the past seven years.
I find no logic, intelligence nor reason in such obviously politically
motivated condemnations.
If the American people were subjected to the same out-of-context
casualties figures after Tarawa or Iwo Jima, without even mentioning
that our forces actually took the Island and defeated the enemy within
and on those Islands, I am sure the majority of the American people
during that period would also "be against winning WWII."
But in true context, yes we suffer casualties in Iraq (mostly because of
an inept officer corps in my opinion - especially in respect to IED
prevention - such as "V" shaped platform vehicles which have been used
by the US Marines and the South Africans for years before the Army
officers would even accept their increased capability to withstand IED
attacks - we are still waiting for those vehicles to be deployed in
Iraq). Yet when we do suffer casualties do we win or lose the battle
that produced them? We win - yet just because we win a single battle
such as Fallujah or elsewhere, and like in every other war we fought
that victory does not mean the enemy is completely defeated. No, the war
goes on, as it must if we are ever going to defeat radical Islam, which
is our true enemy.
I believe these battles in Iraq and Afghanistan are just mere skirmishes
compared to the inevitable major battles that are still to come with
radical Islam. Much the same as our island hoping battles were in
respect to a planned full scale invasion of Japan during WWII.
When we invade the nest, that is when the vermin will be destroyed. All
we are doing now is confining the enemy to its nest, and our noose is
starting to tighten. Israel will be at war with Syria and Hezzbollah
again this summer or fall, and Iran may make its expected fatal mistake
then. We must continue to hold Iraq, and keep our troops there until a
democratic and operational regime has been duly elected and that
government asks us to leave.
Doug Grant (Tm)
|
