Re: Fox's Sean Hannity Challenges Barack Hussein Obama To Confront Him On TV

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:9f04841uc2hn9tqujv381spki9gj725fvs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This is David Johnston's brain on drugs:
>> Sebastian Rector wrote:
>>>Today's most effective media exponent of conservative values and free-
>>>market economics Sean Hannity was recently attacked by Obama in a
>>>piece the latter wrote for a woman's magazine.
>>>
>>>Hannity, who has replaced Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly as America's
>>>"Mr. Conservative", on
>>>last night's Fox News "Hannity and Colmes" hour-long news program,
>>>said that Obama has an open invitation to debate him on TV. Do you
>>>think Obama has the cojones to accept? Don't hold your your breath.
>>>The "brilliant", "articulate" and "charismatic" Obama has refused what
>>>would be a much more kind and gentle TV interview with Bill O'Reilly.
The
>>>Democrat presumptive nominee won't even engage Republican
>>> nominee John McCain in a series of
>>>impromptu town-hall debates where Obama would not be able to use a
>>>prompter and would have to think on his feet.
>
> Ah, the irony!  Bush's most definitive characteristic is his inability
> to speak without heavy preparation.  Bush is incapable of thinking on
> his feet and is easily cornered by the press with even the most
> ordinary and logical questions.   When asked about four dollar gas
> this Spring, he replied, "Four dollars a gallon?  I haven't heard
> anything about that.  Where'd you hear that?"
>
> Less than six weeks later the national average price per gallon for
> regular unleaded was over four dollars.
>
>>>Is this the kind of person America wants to have negotiating as
>>>President with Iran's Ahmadinejad
>>>or other enemies of the West? I don't think so.
>
> Certainly Bush isn't the sort of President I wanted to be doing those
> as well as other things im****tant to national security.  A President
> who listens to opposing views and then makes a decision based on
> reality will certainly be better that the President who listens only
> to those who can provide opinions that sup****t his own and bases his
> decisions on personal perceptions rather than reality.
>
>>Obama has a grudge against Fox and so refuses to talk to them.  If
>>that sort of thing was good enough when it was Bush, why is it a
>>problem now?
>
> Because he's talking about the Opposition Party.  It amazes me no end
> the excuses partisans will make for their own team while accusing the
> other side of things their own politicians are at least equally
> culpable of.

..... "at least equally culpable".... ?!?!?!?.... naw, man.... you're
being 
far too kind... the neocons are always the first to lie and smear and
accuse 
others of behaviours they are always exponentially more culpable of... and

they're always the first to fabricate and whine about transgressions they 
routinely commit...



> When it comes to thinking fast on one's feet, George Bush is hardly
> the model political scientists will point to in the history books.
>
> Swill
> -- 
> No, his mind is not for rent
> To any God or government.
> Always hopeful, yet discontent,
> He knows changes arent permanent,
> But change is.
> http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html