Re: What 'War' Was That Idiot Talking about?

On Jul 22, 7:29 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> bvall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On Jul 22, 2:18 pm, lorad <lorad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Gah... heard it on the radio again..
> >> That *stupid* mantric jingoism by McLame.
>
> >> He said (again); " I would rather lose the elction - than lose 'The
> >> War'.
> >> What 'machismo' !
> >> What idiocy !
>
> >> What fricken 'war' was that idiot talking about?
> >> There is no 'war' - the 'war' is over. (if there ever was one)
> >> GW done declared 'Victory!'. Years ago.
> >> It's all over.
> > .
> >> For the second year running the fricken Iraqis have already (again)
> >> asked us to leave... like soonest.
> > .
> >> Is the idiot McLame going to start a war with them - in order to have
> >> the privilege of wasting another 3.2 TRILLION - for nothing?
..
> >> What's the deal here?
> >> Are the neocon war mongers stupid - or what?
> >> Do they think all voters are as stupid as they are?
..
> >> Are the idiot democrats ever call insane neocon war-mongers 'war-
> >> mongers'?
..
> > The problem is that even Obama and the New York Times admit that we
> > won the war.
..
>   You, of course, have quotes to back up those claims.
..
Don't you ever read a newspaper?  I mean, seriously, these were lead
stories.