Re: What 'War' Was That Idiot Talking about?

On Jul 23, 10:42 am, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> bvall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >  .
> >>> You have a long history of simply ignoring posts after I've spent
> >>> hours looking them up, or pretending they say things they simply
don't
> >>> say.
> > .
> >>     Why would it take hours to find a recent lead story?
> > .
> > Ah, another casual lie from Grapeman.  I never said it would take
> > hours.  The truth is that you're not worth any effort whatsoever.
..
>     You even quoted yourself above where you said I ignored posts after
> you "spent hours looking them up".>
..
And that is the truth.  However, that does not imply that all other
research items will take hours.
..
>Once again you accuse me of lying for repeating what you said and then
you are kind enough to repost what you claim you never said.>
..
No, I accused you of lying for taking a statement of mine, and
pretending that it means something other than what it means.  I never
said that looking up the New York Times comment on Iraq would take
hours - I wrote that OTHER references I sent you took hours.