Re: What 'War' Was That Idiot Talking about?

bvallely@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Jul 23, 10:46 am, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> bvall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>> On Jul 22, 9:06 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> dead kennedy haters wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 22, 8:35 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> dead kennedy haters wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 7:29 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> bvall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2:18 pm, lorad <lorad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Gah... heard it on the radio again..
>>>>>>>>>> That *stupid* mantric jingoism by McLame.
>>>>>>>>>> He said (again); " I would rather lose the elction - than lose
'The
>>>>>>>>>> War'.
>>>>>>>>>> What 'machismo' !
>>>>>>>>>> What idiocy !
>>>>>>>>>> What fricken 'war' was that idiot talking about?
>>>>>>>>>> There is no 'war' - the 'war' is over. (if there ever was one)
>>>>>>>>>> GW done declared 'Victory!'. Years ago.
>>>>>>>>>> It's all over.
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> For the second year running the fricken Iraqis have already
(again)
>>>>>>>>>> asked us to leave... like soonest.
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> Is the idiot McLame going to start a war with them - in order
to have
>>>>>>>>>> the privilege of wasting another 3.2 TRILLION - for nothing?
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> What's the deal here?
>>>>>>>>>> Are the neocon war mongers stupid - or what?
>>>>>>>>>> Do they think all voters are as stupid as they are?
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> Are the idiot democrats ever call insane neocon war-mongers
'war-
>>>>>>>>>> mongers'?
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> The problem is that even Obama and the New York Times admit that
we
>>>>>>>>> won the war.
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>   You, of course, have quotes to back up those claims.
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> Don't you ever read a newspaper?  I mean, seriously, these were
lead
>>>>>>> stories.
>>>>> .
>>>>>>    I read at least three print papers each day including the NY
Times
>>>>>> and several more on line. Since they were lead stories you should
have
>>>>>> no trouble posting them.
>>>>> .
>>>>> The problem I have is not posting the article, it's wasting time
>>>>> looking up articles for you.
> .
>>>>> You have a long history of simply ignoring posts after I've spent
>>>>> hours looking them up, or pretending they say things they simply
don't
>>>>> say.
> .
>>>>     Guess what vallely and "dead kennedy haters" have in common?
> .
>>> I've openly admitted that "Dead Kennedy Haters" is a glitch -
>>> sometimes my posts are labeled by that name.  Don't know why it does
>>> that, I wish it didn't.
> .
>>    I am curious, how do you suppose that could happen?
> .
> Don't know.  Don't care.
   Amazing, you claim that you have no control over your user name and 
you do not care.