Re: Friends of George

On Jul 23, 11:41=A0am, "Eddie Haskell" <h...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "z" <gzuck...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:aeca01f3-de80-41d8-b468-70f67dfb5391@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 18, 10:03 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <hhs...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > How impressive. Now, formulate an equation that will tell us the how
mu=
ch
> > oil the US has and how long it will last with the following
information=
:
>
> > 1) US percentage of world produced oil consumption.
>
> > 2) US percentage of world reserves.
>
> > "we own 3% of the world's oil. we use 25% of the world's oil. are you
> > really thinking that if we could only get at all of that 3%,
> > everything would work out? you guys really take bush's hatred of
> > "fuzzy math" to heart."
> > i did that.
>
> No you didn't.
>
> > you didn't like it.
>
> You don't like the fact that I called you on your fuzzy math.
>
> > i guess it's gone through that
> > colander you call a skull now.
>
> This from the dunderhad that thinks that stating the % of produced oil
we
> use in conjuction with our known % of reserves tells us how much oil we
h=
ave
> and how much it will last.
>
> Dumb dumb dumb...
>
Yes, Eddie, you are "dumb, dumb, dumber". Along with those % numbers
you keep mentioning are numbers representing the actual amount of oil
we have (proven reserves). Those are the numbers used to calculate how
much oil we have (because they *are* the amount of oil we have). Do
you understand yet?

I didn't think so...
--
Dave Fritzinger
Honolulu, HI