Re: What 'War' Was That Idiot Talking about?

On Jul 23, 12:30=A0pm, retrogro...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:17:30 -0700 (PDT), "bvall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>
>
>
> <bvall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >.
> >> <bvall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >.
> >> >> >The problem is that even Obama and the New York Times admit that
w=
e
> >> >> >won the war.
> >.
> >> >> SO we can go home then?
> >.
> >> >That was the approach we used after WWI. =A0By abandoning Germany
and
> >> >returning home after the war, we allowed Adolf Hitler to rise to
> >> >power.
> >.
> >> >After WWII, having learned our lesson, the United States instituted
> >> >the Marshal Plan which, in today's money, cost trillions. =A0Thanks
t=
o
> >> >that forward looking plan, we know have powerful allies instead of
> >> >powerful enemies.
> >.
> >> >So tell me - why do you want to emulate the plan that brought us
Adol=
f
> >> >Hitler instead of the one that brought about lasting peace?
=2E
> >> ANy fool knows it was the reparations that brought Hitler into
power.>
=2E
> >Quite correct - and those reparations would not have happened without
> >the approval of President Woodrow Wilson.
=2E
> More revisionist BS. Wilson tried to talk the French out of the harsh
> reparations but was unsuccessful.
=2E
> http://www.papermasters.com/woodrow_wilson.html

Your own source said... "(Wilson) agreed to the resolutions drafted in
his absence, but it is clear that the war guilt clause was not his
creation."

So, Woodrow didn't agree with the Treaty, but signed it anyway.

He then bugged out of Europe, and sat by as Hitler rose to power.

And this is the tactic that you demand we duplicate in Iraq?

You're an idiot.