Re: What 'War' Was That Idiot Talking about?

On Jul 25, 4:48 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> dead kennedy haters wrote:
> > On Jul 25, 1:35 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> dead kennedy haters wrote:
> >>> On Jul 24, 9:13 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>    Vallely in this thread:
> >>>>    Claims that both Obama and the NY Times have said we won the
war.
> >>>>   Asked for a site he asks if I read papers because they were lead
stories.
> >>>>   When I noted that I read multiple papers and never saw that item
> >>>> Vallely says he is not willing to spend hours finding a link.
> >>>>    I noted that if they were lead stories it would not take hours
to
> >>>> find them.
> >>>>   Vallely denies saying it would take hours and is kind enough to
> >>>> include the  quote from an earlier post of mine where I reposted
his
> >>>> claim that he spends hours looking for links.
> >>>>    I note that Vallely never posted a link to back up his claims
and ask
> >>>> why they do not turn up in a google search.
> >>>>    Vallely loses interest in the topic.
> >>> I'm through treating you like an adult.
> >>> Waste somebody else's time.
> >>    Standard response when you can not back up your fantasies. Can you
> >> refute these facts?
>
> >>     You claimed the the NY Times and Obama both said we have won the
war.
>
> >>     You never posted links for either claim.
>
> >>     google searches fail to show anything about either claim.
>
> >>     You said both were lead stories but you are unwilling to spend
> >> "hours" finding them.
>
> >>    You denied saying it would take hours but included your own words
to
> >> that effect in your reply.
>
> >>    Whenever you are asked to back up your fantasies you say doing so
is
> >> a waste of time.
..
> > Waste someone else's time.
..
>    Translation:Once again Vallely can not back up his fantasies.
..
No, I'm simply not playing your troll games anymore.