On Aug 4, 6:25=A0am, "Eddie Haskell" <h...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Dave Fritzinger" <dfrit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:d8838b43-0e8b-4183-be26-1bb5f14783d1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 25, 4:00 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <hhs...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Dave Fritzinger" <dfrit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:d81057b8-bafc-4458-99f1-0cdb35ab6560@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Jul 25, 7:12 am, "Eddie Haskell" <h...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > "Dave Fritzinger" <dfrit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >
>news:804c4021-2c07-4f95-ae20-fb9f4f03f368@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Jul 23, 11:41 am, "Eddie Haskell" <h...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > "z" <gzuck...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >
>news:aeca01f3-de80-41d8-b468-70f67dfb5391@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > On Jul 18, 10:03 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <hhs...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > How impressive. Now, formulate an equation that will tell us the
=
how
> > > > > much
> > > > > oil the US has and how long it will last with the following
> > > > > information:
>
> > > > > 1) US percentage of world produced oil consumption.
>
> > > > > 2) US percentage of world reserves.
>
> > > > > "we own 3% of the world's oil. we use 25% of the world's oil.
are
> > > > > you
> > > > > really thinking that if we could only get at all of that 3%,
> > > > > everything would work out? you guys really take bush's hatred of
> > > > > "fuzzy math" to heart."
> > > > > i did that.
>
> > > > No you didn't.
>
> > > > > you didn't like it.
>
> > > > You don't like the fact that I called you on your fuzzy math.
>
> > > > > i guess it's gone through that
> > > > > colander you call a skull now.
>
> > > > This from the dunderhad that thinks that stating the % of produced
=
oil
> > > > we
> > > > use in conjuction with our known % of reserves tells us how much
oi=
l
> > > > we
> > > > have
> > > > and how much it will last.
>
> > > > Dumb dumb dumb...
>
> > > > Yes, Eddie, you are "dumb, dumb, dumber". Along with those %
number=
s
> > > > you keep mentioning are numbers representing the actual amount of
o=
il
> > > > we have (proven reserves). Those are the numbers used to calculate
=
how
> > > > much oil we have (because they *are* the amount of oil we have).
Do
> > > > you understand yet?
> > > > I didn't think so...
>
> > > The % of world of reserves we have is only relative to the amount of
> > > reserves in the world, not the amount of PRODUCED oil we consume, Z,
=
ya
> > > big
> > > zero. And that's what you get in math too, a big zero.
> > > Two points. I am not Z.
>
> > Oops.. My bad. You two touting the same irrelevant numbers - it's easy
=
to
> > get confused.
>
> > Now, let this be an example to you as to being a man and admitting
when
> > you
> > have erred.
>
> > > Second, you are wrong again. I only mentioned
> > > percentages to show how small our reserves in comparison to how much
> > > oil we consume. The rest of my numbers were based on the number of
> > > barrels used and proven reserves, in barrels.
> > > God, it must suck to be you. You declare victory when you have
> > > actually shown you *still* don't understand my argument.
>
> > I understand your argument. You thought that the 25% and 3% figures
bor=
e
> > relevance, and seek any op****tunity to pooh pooh drilling no matter
wha=
t
> > in
> > service of your party masters. That's what got you into trouble in the
> > first
> > place.
>
> > No, you obviously don't understand my argument, since my argument has
> > to do with the total proven reserves of the US, about 21 billion
> > barrels. What got you in trouble is that you are unable to read for
> > comprehension.
>
> Facts are stubborn things, Dave.
Yes, Eddie, facts are stubborn. Too bad for you the facts show that
you are wrong, again.
What did you do while you were on hiatus for the last week. Whatever
it was, it certainly did not include learning anything.
[snip of Eddie's repetitive foolishness]
--
Dave Fritzinger
Honolulu, HI
|
