On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:30:21 -0700, 1560 Dead
<zepp1560#2211finestplanet.com> wrote:
Im so glad terri is dead and hope that she stayed dead for ever i
hope her husband got a pile of move and that he goes out and spends it
of hos and drugs and satanism
>On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:57:49 GMT, greccogirl <greccogirl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>1545 Dead wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:11:03 GMT, greccogirl <greccogirl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>1543 Dead wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:57:46 GMT, greccogirl <greccogirl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>1543 Dead wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:43:18 GMT, greccogirl <greccogirl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>gjohns01@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Liberals,HATE-America.,' wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Chalk up another victim to the bloodthirsty liberals and their
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>culture of
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>death. Terri Schiavo has been starved to death.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>1500 babies being slaughtered per day just isn't enough for
these
>>>>>>>>>>bloodthirsty killers. Poor Terri. She just didn't fit the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>bloodthirsty
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>liberals idea of a human being who would be allowed to live. She
was
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>brain
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>damaged, not dead. She slept, woke and smiled. She was not sick,
She
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>was
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>physically healthy and all her organs worked. She needed no life
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>sup****t.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>She only needed help being fed just as many who are paralyzed or
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>severely
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>retarded. I guess the bloodthirsty liberals will go after them
next.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>After
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>all, they are just a drain on society and serve no purpose.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Hitler is smiling in Hell. Liberals have done him proud.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>>>Liberals are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being.
>>>>>>>>>>They are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted,
closed-minded,
>>>>>>>>>>selfish, intolerant, bigoted and racist.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Very amusing. Conservatives love going to war against nations
that
>>>>>>>>>never threaten us, celebrate the killing of tens of thousands of
>>>>>>>>>innocent civilians in the process. Conservatives love the
executions of
>>>>>>>>>the brain-damaged and minors. Conservatives want to ignore the
>>>>>>>>>body-bags of our best and brightest coming back from their
useless
>>>>>>>>>wars.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And yet this Republican still thinks he can lecture us because
we
>>>>>>>>>didn't want to stand in the way of the wishes of hopelessly
>>>>>>>>>brain-damaged woman.
>>>>>>>>> I got news for you, hypocrits like yourself will occupy a lower
>>>>>>>>>level of Hell than any of us ever see.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You are so full of crap. There was NO COMPELLING evidence of what
Terri
>>>>>>>>wanted. Her husband wanted to kill her and he got away with it in
court.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On more than 20 occassions. With more than 30 judges involved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I bet the coronor's office is in on the conspiracy, too, huh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh it wasn't a conspiracy. In this country you can get away with
>>>>>>legalized murder, hell you can even get your wife put into a hospice
>>>>>>against Florida law when she isn't terminally ill.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Where else are you gonna put them if there is no hope of recovery?
>>>>>Schiavo's parents tried that, back in 1993. They gave up after six
>>>>>months. Returned her to the hospice.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hell, you can even kill someone against their wishes WHEN THEY SAY
>>>>>>diferrently themselves:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.internationaltaskforce.org/mm.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I notice that the man is not PVS, and in fact is very clearly
>>>>>conscious and aware of his surroundings, is able to communicate
>>>>>through a computer, He indicates that he is happy and wants to live.
>>>>>
>>>>>Under those cir***stances, nobody in their right mind would advocate
>>>>>removing his sup****t. That wife sounds like one seriously crazy
****.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>As previously re****ted in the Update (5-6/93), the case of
41-year-old
>>>>>>Michael Martin, severely disabled as the result of a 1987 car-train
>>>>>>accident, is currently before the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Michael,
>>>>>>who experts say is not in a persistent vegetative state, has
indicated
>>>>>>that he wants to live. His wife and current legal guardian, Mary
Martin,
>>>>>>petitioned a Michigan Probate Court to have Michael's gastrostomy
tube
>>>>>>feeding stopped, claiming that Michael had made statements prior to
the
>>>>>>accident indicating that he would not want to live as a "vegetable."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But 2 of Michael's co-workers, who were present at the time Michael
made
>>>>>>those statements, testified that his present condition is not the
type
>>>>>>Michael referred to in those statements. Probate Judge George Greig
>>>>>>rejected Mary Martin's request to have Michael starved and
dehydrated to
>>>>>>death because Michael's pre-accident statements were not in writing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The judge would have granted the request if Michael were terminally
ill
>>>>>>or unconscious. The fact that Michael indicated that he wanted to
live
>>>>>>was ruled irrelevant by the judge because of Michael's "impaired
>>>>>>condition." The judge also refused to give legal standing to
Michael's
>>>>>>mother and sister, who were attempting to remove his wife as legal
guardian.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Understand???? They were going to starve this man to death even
though
>>>>>>he HIMSELF COMMUNICATED LEAVE ME ALONE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So let's not talk about conspiracy. It isn't needed in America when
it
>>>>>>comes to pulling people's feeding tubes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You're saying "if x, y, and z were not the case, then this might have
>>>>>happened. " That makes no sense at all, since x, y, and z were the
>>>>>case, and the reason your supposition did not happen.
>>>>>
>>>>>Don't you GET it? The judge said he would have granted the wife's
>>>>
>>>>request had Michael been "unconscious". HIS LIVING WILL SAID he
wanted
>>>>to live, but the judge wouldn't have followed it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, the judge said he would if had Michael been PSV or
>>> "non-responsive". The judge went and interviewed Michael himself (an
>>> unedited copy of the proceedings is available at
>>> http://bhs.msu.edu/martin.htm
and determined that no grounds existed
>>> for withdrawal of the feeding tube. The Court of Appeals back the
>>> judge on this, as did the state high court.
>>>
>>> The testimony is clear that Michael often said he didn't want to be
>>> kept alive if he was totally incapacitated and dependent on others.
>>> That's what his wife was basing her petitions on, but Michael himself
>>> is indicating that he no longer feels that he should be terminated
>>> because of his condition. While his cognitive abilities are in doubt,
>>> the court must assume the validity of his wishes.
>>>
>>> I don't see anything to fault the court on. You're basing your
>>> outrage on a hypothetical remark a judge made, even though the judge
>>> found otherwise and ruled exactly the way you would have wanted him
>>> to.
>>
>>So tell me why this even had to go to court? Why it went to the SUPREME
>>court in that state? Michael's feelings didn't "change". He wasn't
>>"totally incapacitated". That is the entire point.
>
>It went to court because the wife felt he should die, and the court is
>obliged to consider the matter, since the wife has the first amendment
>right to be heard.
>>
>>So if you feel that the courts are correct and everyone should have
>>"choice" (I love that liberal buzz word) explain how a suspected
>>prisoner is now being force fed through a feeding tube who is on a
>>hunger strike:
>
>Are you expecting me to approve of forced feeding of prisoners?
>>
>>
>>
>>http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-cuban-espionage,0,819167.story?coll=sns-ap-nation-headlines
>>
>>Judges: Feds Can Put Feeding Tube in Cuban
>>
>>
>>By Associated Press
>>
>>April 15, 2005, 4:02 PM EDT
>>
>>
>>
>>MIAMI -- A judge cleared the way for federal officials to have a feeding
>>tube inserted in a Cuban exile who is on a weekslong hunger strike to
>>protest his detention as a suspected spy.
>>
>>Juan Emilio Aboy was at Jackson Memorial Hospital's inmate ward,
>>hospital spokeswoman Lorraine Nelson said Friday.
>>
>>A day earlier, U.S. District Judge Paul Huck agreed with another judge's
>>order to "involuntarily administer nutrients" to Aboy through a stomach
>>or intravenous tube, and to restrain him if he attempts to remove it.
>>
>>"The decision to not eat was his choice. A court order was issued
>>allowing the U.S. Public Health Service to take any necessary
>>precautions in the interest of his health," said Nina Pruneda,
>>spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Miami.
>>
>>
>>
>>Too bad poor Terri Schavio wasn't a suspected spy. She'd still be
alive.
>
>-
>
>Carl M. Forti, a spokesman for the National Republican
> Congressional Committee -- "A month from now,
>people are not going to remember [Terri Schiavo],"
>he said, and 20 months from now, in the 2006
>elections, "it will be irrelevant."
>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/26/politics/26delay.html?
>
>
>Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
>Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
>For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
>http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
>For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
>http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
>For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
>http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
|
