Kurt Lochner wrote:
> Make Altered wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> >
> > Kurt Lochner restored:
> > >
> > > Alien Child wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > > >
> > > > Kurt Lochner wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Slapped_Jaw wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bullfinch wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > GOP?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Isn't that the stuff you put on your garden slugs?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As a life long liberal democrat I'm ashamed of your vulger
> > > > > > > responses to legitimate grips about the left. If you have
> > > > > > > nothing to say don't just spray words...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bullfinch, it's been there so long that I've just gotten
> > > > > > used to it. It appears vulgarity and ad hominem attacks are
> > > > > > what liberals use with faced with logic and reason.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, right.. "what liberals use with faced with logic and
> > > > > reason"
> > > > >
> > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > hate"..
> >
> > You meant to say-
> > These postings prove that the right-wing is the "party of hate"..
>
> You're again attempting to deflect into a meaningless
> 'micro-debate' called a 'grammar flame', to which I
> retort, "Are the nits fresh today?"
>
> > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > hate"..
> > > >
> > > > They do?
> > >
> > > *>LOL!<* And you don't see how?
> >
> > You began your sentence with a conjunction.
>
> Nope, I 'began' my sentence with a n expression of laughter..
>
> > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > hate"..
> > > >
> > > > They do?
> > >
> > > *>LOL!<* And you don't see how?
> > >
> > > > I'm sure that after pouring over thousands of posts over the
> > > > last two years,
> > >
> > > You're not very good with numbers, are you "slapped-jaw"..
> >
> > An ellipsis is three dots, not two[..]
>
> Of course, you are trying to evade the numerical mistake
> that you've made with three separate aliases, and run away..
>
> > > > But your results tend to prove my point -[..]
> > >
> > > *>LOL!<* You're not very good at this. Please refrain
> > > from pretending to understand logic and critical thinking.
> > >
> > > It'll save you from embarrassing yourself later on..
> > >
> > > > Compare your finds with a liberal retort I'll put below[..]
> > >
> > > You're pretending to have factually cited something as valid
> > > when in fact you've clearly no comprehension of facts or
> > > numbers that don't suit your narrow-minded beliefs..
> > >
> > > --And changing your alias didn't fool anyone but yourself..
> >
> > Incorrect grammar and the semantics[..]
>
> Okay, let's look at your mistake again..
>
> "I'm sure that after pouring over thousands of posts over the last
> two years,[..]"
>
> Let's see if there's any truth to that.. From my posting..
> *-*-* *-*-*
> "I truly and sincerely hope you die a horrible death,
> and more than that, I hope it's caught on tape so
> that I can watch you scream in agony as I just laugh
> and laugh and laugh. What a sick bastard."
> Fraud Robertson <rob440@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 03:18:10 GMT
> *-*-* *-*-*
> "How horrible, how wrong it would be, Lochner, if, while
> you were typing something like this, your fat drunken face
> were slammed forward into your monitor so hard that the
> tube imploded and your head caught on fire. I would deplore
> any such eventuality, and could never approve such a thing.
> Violence, shrieking bloody high voltage flaming mayhem and
> mutilation, can never be right, no matter how much of a
> crawling, disgusting, despicable, worthless little toad
> that you prove yourself to be.
>
> johnz~ <johnsabotta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mon, 05 Feb 2001 05:11:20 GMT
> *-*-* *-*-*
> "Let's take a nice, Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon style pure-democratic
> vote: All for putting Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon up against the wall,
> and filling him full of lead, say "AYE!" All opposed, say "NAY"
> Let's see how much Sliverdick likes democracy now."
>
> Aaron R. Kulkis <akulkis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:47:32 -0400
> *-*-* *-*-*
> "Liberal and socialists will be targets to
> shoot on sight when the **** hits the fan."
>
> Dr Fuji Kamikase <drfujikamikaze@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 30 Aug 2000 00:56:06 GMT
> *-*-*- -*-*-*
> "Damned despicable LIARS should have their kneecaps broke
> into 87 pieces."
>
> Wayne Mann (tpd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:58:56 -0700
> news:<ierops45b7csgnb4k8useojfsi7qe8qdgt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=author%3Atpd
> %40callamerica.net+%22kneecaps%22 *-*-*-
> -*-*-* "I want to see Uncle Sam jam a goddamn electrode
> in Hanson's cranium so we can finally get some
> ****ing TRUTH out of you lying sacks of ****.
>
> Yeah, can you feel the anger, you lying piece of **** ****s?
> The whole ****ed-up country is filled with lying sacks of ****
> like you and Lochner and Gandalf now and my one consolation is
> that you've succeeeded in ****ing your own kids, too."
>
> "File of the Dud" <fileofthedead@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> news:<HrHw9.1988$7n.202613@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sat, 02 Nov 2002 03:15:51 GMT
> *-*-* *-*-*
>
> > So much for the liberal response.
>
> *>LOL!<* Yeah, right-wing retards can't do math..
>
> --See subject header for details, 'tardlet..
>
> "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express
> it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot
> measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
> is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind." --Lord Kelvin
You must understand, it is exceedingly tiresome to try to carry on a
conversation with an uneducated, boorish ignoramus. Your writing and
comprehension skills resemble that of a sixth-grader. When you use
terms like "critical thinking" when you obviously have no concept of
their meaning, you only serve to embarrass yourself.
I didn't want to belittle your intellectual inferiority, but you left
me no choice.
--
* * * *
Mike
|
