Make Altered wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
>
> Kurt Lochner was laughing at the silly sock=puppet known as:
> >
> >Make Altered wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > >
> > > Kurt Lochner restored:
> > > >
> > > > Alien Child wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > > > >
> > > > > Kurt Lochner wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slapped_Jaw wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bullfinch wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > GOP?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Isn't that the stuff you put on your garden slugs?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As a life long liberal democrat I'm ashamed of your vulger
> > > > > > > > responses to legitimate grips about the left. If you have
> > > > > > > > nothing to say don't just spray words...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bullfinch, it's been there so long that I've just gotten
> > > > > > > used to it. It appears vulgarity and ad hominem attacks are
> > > > > > > what liberals use with faced with logic and reason.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, right.. "what liberals use with faced with logic and
> > > > > > reason"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > > hate"..
> > >
> > > You meant to say-
> > > These postings prove that the right-wing is the "party of hate"..
> >
> > You're again attempting to deflect into a meaningless
> > 'micro-debate' called a 'grammar flame', to which I
> > retort, "Are the nits fresh today?"
*>cricket.wav<*
> > > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > > hate"..
> > > > >
> > > > > They do?
> > > >
> > > > *>LOL!<* And you don't see how?
> > >
> > > You began your sentence with a conjunction.
> >
> > Nope, I 'began' my sentence with an expression of laughter..
*>cricket.wav<*
> > > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > > hate"..
> > > > >
> > > > > They do?
> > > >
> > > > *>LOL!<* And you don't see how?
> > > >
> > > > > I'm sure that after pouring over thousands of posts over the
> > > > > last two years,
> > > >
> > > > You're not very good with numbers, are you "slapped-jaw"..
> > >
> > > An ellipsis is three dots, not two[..]
> >
> > Of course, you are trying to evade the numerical mistake
> > that you've made with three separate aliases, and run away..
*>cricket.wav<*
> > > > > But your results tend to prove my point -[..]
> > > >
> > > > *>LOL!<* You're not very good at this. Please refrain
> > > > from pretending to understand logic and critical thinking.
> > > >
> > > > It'll save you from embarrassing yourself later on..
> > > >
> > > > > Compare your finds with a liberal retort I'll put below[..]
> > > >
> > > > You're pretending to have factually cited something as valid
> > > > when in fact you've clearly no comprehension of facts or
> > > > numbers that don't suit your narrow-minded beliefs..
> > > >
> > > > --And changing your alias didn't fool anyone but yourself..
> > >
> > > Incorrect grammar and the semantics[..]
> >
> > Okay, let's look at your mistake again..
> >
> > "I'm sure that after pouring over thousands of posts over the last
> > two years,[..]"
> >
> > Let's see if there's any truth to that.. From my posting..
> > *-*-* *-*-*
> > "I truly and sincerely hope you die a horrible death,
> > and more than that, I hope it's caught on tape so
> > that I can watch you scream in agony as I just laugh
> > and laugh and laugh. What a sick bastard."
> > Fraud Robertson <rob440@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 03:18:10 GMT
> > *-*-* *-*-*
> > "How horrible, how wrong it would be, Lochner, if, while
> > you were typing something like this, your fat drunken face
> > were slammed forward into your monitor so hard that the
> > tube imploded and your head caught on fire. I would deplore
> > any such eventuality, and could never approve such a thing.
> > Violence, shrieking bloody high voltage flaming mayhem and
> > mutilation, can never be right, no matter how much of a
> > crawling, disgusting, despicable, worthless little toad
> > that you prove yourself to be.
> >
> > johnz~ <johnsabotta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mon, 05 Feb 2001 05:11:20 GMT
> > *-*-* *-*-*
> > "Let's take a nice, Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon style pure-democratic
> > vote: All for putting Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon up against the wall,
> > and filling him full of lead, say "AYE!" All opposed, say "NAY"
> > Let's see how much Sliverdick likes democracy now."
> >
> > Aaron R. Kulkis <akulkis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:47:32 -0400
> > *-*-* *-*-*
> > "Liberal and socialists will be targets to
> > shoot on sight when the **** hits the fan."
> >
> > Dr Fuji Kamikase <drfujikamikaze@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 30 Aug 2000 00:56:06 GMT
> > *-*-*- -*-*-*
> > "Damned despicable LIARS should have their kneecaps broke
> > into 87 pieces."
> >
> > Wayne Mann (tpd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:58:56 -0700
> > news:<ierops45b7csgnb4k8useojfsi7qe8qdgt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=author%3Atpd
> > %40callamerica.net+%22kneecaps%22 *-*-*-
> > -*-*-* "I want to see Uncle Sam jam a goddamn electrode
> > in Hanson's cranium so we can finally get some
> > ****ing TRUTH out of you lying sacks of ****.
> >
> > Yeah, can you feel the anger, you lying piece of **** ****s?
> > The whole ****ed-up country is filled with lying sacks of ****
> > like you and Lochner and Gandalf now and my one consolation is
> > that you've succeeeded in ****ing your own kids, too."
> >
> > "File of the Dud" <fileofthedead@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > news:<HrHw9.1988$7n.202613@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Sat, 02 Nov 2002 03:15:51 GMT
> > *-*-* *-*-*
> >
> > > So much for the liberal response.
> >
> > *>LOL!<* Yeah, right-wing retards can't do math..
> >
> > --See subject header for details, 'tardlet..
> >
> > "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express
> > it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot
> > measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
> > is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind." --Lord Kelvin
>
>You must understand, it is exceedingly tiresome to try to carry
>on a conversation with an uneducated, boorish ignoramus.
I certainly do understand, you uneducated, boorish ignoramus..
>I didn't want to belittle your intellectual inferiority,[..]
Good, as you certain haven't demonstrated even the rudiments
of being able to do such as you've pretended to claim..
--See subject header for details..
|
