Re: Democracts lied about their Sup****t for the War

2091 Dead, 5 since Murtha vote wrote:

> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:03:07 GMT, "SlackJaw" <ert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > SlackJaw wrote:
> > 
> >> 2080 Dead wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:58:18 -0000, Tom Betz
> >> > <spammers_lie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > >2080 Dead <zepp#22112080dead@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> in >> > > news:****sn1144dfe98s1b7bj68j0i2ues0urdn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > 
> >> > >> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:23:09 GMT, "SlackJaw" <ert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:  >> > >> 
> >> > > > > OK, I'll bite...What is it that Bush knew that the
> Democrats >> > > > > didn't?
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> That Bush was lying.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Actually, (I realized this while listening to Carl Levin
> talking >> > > about the NIE today) a majority of the Democratic
> members of the >> > > Senate Intelligence Committee (Graham, Levin,
> Wyden, Mikulski, >> > > Graham, and Durbin) voted against the Iraq
> resolution.  They had >> > > read the classified version of the NIE
> with the qualifiers Cheney >> > > and Bush permitted to be included
> still in place, not the >> > > unclassified version that the rest of
> the Senate saw, and they >> > > knew that the NIE did not make a
> solid case for the invasion of >> > > Iraq; but they were prohibited
> by law from telling the rest of >> > > the Senate about the
> qualifiers, because those qualifiers were >> > > only in the
> classified version!  >> > > 
> >> > > What I can't understand is how Feinstein, Edwards, Rockefeller
> and >> > > Bayh were conned into voting for it.
> >> > 
> >> > Edwards, at least, issued a public apology for that vote the
> other >> > day.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Ah, Zepp, there you are.
> >> 
> >> I see you admire people who issue  public apologies.
> >> 
> >> I was wondering if you still stand by your statements about the
> >> resolution about Iraq - to wit:
> >> ---
> >> They voted to let him [Bush] have a free hand provided he got UN
> >> backing to attack Iraq and if Iraq was an immediate threat to the
> >> security of the United States.
> >> ---
> >> 
> >> I await your response...
> 
> Where was the immediate threat, chuckles?
> 
> Hmmm?
> 
> Didn't get UN backing, either, even though Putsch said he would.
> 
> Lied about that, too.
> 
> Still gonna play word games, or come out and admit Putsch lied America
> into war?
> > 
> > Still waiting...

Failure to address the question noted.

Still Waiting...


> --
> "'I’m not meeting with that goddamned *****,' Bush screamed at aides
> who suggested he meet with Cindy Sheehan, the war-protesting mother
> whose son died in Iraq. 'She can go to hell as far as I’m
> concerned!'"   --Putsch, a decompensating drunk
> 
> "Grover Norquist couldn't drown the government, so he drowned New
> Orleans instead."
> 
> Not dead, in jail, or a slave?  Thank a liberal!
> Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
> For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
> http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
> For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
> http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
> For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
> http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
> 
> a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson



-- 
**---------------------------
Being conservative means you're on the right side.
---