Make Altered wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
>
> Kurt Lochner restored the deleted text/context evaded by:
> >
> >Make Altered wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > >
> > > Kurt Lochner was laughing at the silly sock=puppet known as:
> > > >
> > > >Make Altered wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > > > >
> > > > > Kurt Lochner restored:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alien Child wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kurt Lochner wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Slapped_Jaw wrote from cpe-066-057-036-150.nc.res.rr.com:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bullfinch wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > GOP?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Isn't that the stuff you put on your garden slugs?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As a life long liberal democrat I'm ashamed of your
vulger
> > > > > > > > > > responses to legitimate grips about the left. If you
have
> > > > > > > > > > nothing to say don't just spray words...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bullfinch, it's been there so long that I've just gotten
> > > > > > > > > used to it. It appears vulgarity and ad hominem attacks
are
> > > > > > > > > what liberals use with faced with logic and reason.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yeah, right.. "what liberals use with faced with logic
and
> > > > > > > > reason"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > > > > hate"..
> > > > >
> > > > > You meant to say-
> > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing is the "party of
hate"..
> > > >
> > > > You're again attempting to deflect into a meaningless
> > > > 'micro-debate' called a 'grammar flame', to which I
> > > > retort, "Are the nits fresh today?"
*>cricket.wav<*
> > > > > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > > > > hate"..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > They do?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *>LOL!<* And you don't see how?
> > > > >
> > > > > You began your sentence with a conjunction.
> > > >
> > > > Nope, I 'began' my sentence with an expression of laughter..
*>cricket.wav<*
> > > > > > > > These postings prove that the right-wing are the "party of
> > > > > > > > hate"..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > They do?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *>LOL!<* And you don't see how?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm sure that after pouring over thousands of posts over the
> > > > > > > last two years,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You're not very good with numbers, are you "slapped-jaw"..
> > > > >
> > > > > An ellipsis is three dots, not two[..]
> > > >
> > > > Of course, you are trying to evade the numerical mistake
> > > > that you've made with three separate aliases, and run away..
*>cricket.wav<*
> > > > > > > But your results tend to prove my point -[..]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *>LOL!<* You're not very good at this. Please refrain
> > > > > > from pretending to understand logic and critical thinking.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It'll save you from embarrassing yourself later on..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Compare your finds with a liberal retort I'll put below[..]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You're pretending to have factually cited something as valid
> > > > > > when in fact you've clearly no comprehension of facts or
> > > > > > numbers that don't suit your narrow-minded beliefs..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --And changing your alias didn't fool anyone but yourself..
> > > > >
> > > > > Incorrect grammar and the semantics[..]
> > > >
> > > > Okay, let's look at your mistake again..
> > > >
> > > > "I'm sure that after pouring over thousands of posts over the last
> > > > two years,[..]"
> > > >
> > > > Let's see if there's any truth to that.. From my posting..
> > > > *-*-*
*-*-*
> > > > "I truly and sincerely hope you die a horrible death,
> > > > and more than that, I hope it's caught on tape so
> > > > that I can watch you scream in agony as I just laugh
> > > > and laugh and laugh. What a sick bastard."
> > > > Fraud Robertson <rob440@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 03:18:10
GMT
> > > > *-*-*
*-*-*
> > > > "How horrible, how wrong it would be, Lochner, if, while
> > > > you were typing something like this, your fat drunken face
> > > > were slammed forward into your monitor so hard that the
> > > > tube imploded and your head caught on fire. I would deplore
> > > > any such eventuality, and could never approve such a thing.
> > > > Violence, shrieking bloody high voltage flaming mayhem and
> > > > mutilation, can never be right, no matter how much of a
> > > > crawling, disgusting, despicable, worthless little toad
> > > > that you prove yourself to be.
> > > >
> > > > johnz~ <johnsabotta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mon, 05 Feb 2001 05:11:20 GMT
> > > > *-*-*
*-*-*
> > > > "Let's take a nice, Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon style
pure-democratic
> > > > vote: All for putting Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon up against the
wall,
> > > > and filling him full of lead, say "AYE!" All opposed, say "NAY"
> > > > Let's see how much Sliverdick likes democracy now."
> > > >
> > > > Aaron R. Kulkis <akulkis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:47:32 -0400
> > > > *-*-*
*-*-*
> > > > "Liberal and socialists will be targets to
> > > > shoot on sight when the **** hits the fan."
> > > >
> > > > Dr Fuji Kamikase <drfujikamikaze@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 30 Aug 2000 00:56:06
GMT
> > > > *-*-*-
-*-*-*
> > > > "Damned despicable LIARS should have their kneecaps broke
> > > > into 87 pieces."
> > > >
> > > > Wayne Mann (tpd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:58:56 -0700
> > > > news:<ierops45b7csgnb4k8useojfsi7qe8qdgt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > >
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=author%3Atpd
> > > > %40callamerica.net+%22kneecaps%22 *-*-*-
> > > > -*-*-* "I want to see Uncle Sam jam a goddamn electrode
> > > > in Hanson's cranium so we can finally get some
> > > > ****ing TRUTH out of you lying sacks of ****.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, can you feel the anger, you lying piece of **** ****s?
> > > > The whole ****ed-up country is filled with lying sacks of ****
> > > > like you and Lochner and Gandalf now and my one consolation is
> > > > that you've succeeeded in ****ing your own kids, too."
> > > >
> > > > "File of the Dud" <fileofthedead@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > news:<HrHw9.1988$7n.202613@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > Sat, 02 Nov 2002 03:15:51 GMT
> > > > *-*-*
*-*-*
Still having trouble with numbers, so you deleted that which
you cannot defeat, and wandered off into a 'lame.. *>LOL!<*
> > > > > So much for the liberal response.
> > > >
> > > > *>LOL!<* Yeah, right-wing retards can't do math..
> > > >
> > > > --See subject header for details, 'tardlet..
> > > >
> > > > "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express
> > > > it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot
> > > > measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
> > > > is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind." --Lord Kelvin
> > >
> > >You must understand, it is exceedingly tiresome to try to carry
> > >on a conversation with an uneducated, boorish ignoramus.
> >
> > I certainly do understand, you uneducated, boorish ignoramus..
> >
> > >I didn't want to belittle your intellectual inferiority,[..]
> >
> > Good, as you certain haven't demonstrated even the rudiments
> > of being able to do such as you've pretended to claim..
>
>(Sigh) One more time...
Okay, read it and weep, neophyte..
From: "Mike Alder" <rufh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: GOP? Slug Bait!!!
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.15.7.4
Message-ID: <hBuff.723$xD5.1129448@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:46:05 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.57.36.150
"Isn't that called fixation, or is it obsession?"
From: "SlackJaw" <ert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: GOP? Slug Bait!!!
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.15.7.4
Message-ID: <Juuff.716$xD5.1129448@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:39:05 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.57.36.150
"You've been collecting these since 2003!?"
From: "Alan Child" <djdj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: GOP? Slug Bait!!!
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.15.7.4
Message-ID: <Kuuff.717$xD5.1129448@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:39:06 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.57.36.150
"I'm sure that after pouring over thousands of posts over the last
two years, you were able to find some inappropiate posts by rightists."
Okay, you claimed that *I* poured "over thousands of posts over
the last two years", when in fact the dates refute your silly
mentions of such.. Your evasions, by way of 'grammar flame',
do not mean anything to me.. Here's why, sock-puppet..
>Once again, writing at a elementary school level[..]
That's so you'll be able to comprehend what a right-wing retard you
are.. By the way, it's spelled "inappropriate" not "inappropiate"..
Learn how to spell before you go off on a grammar flame.. *>LOL!<*
>I'll tell you this one last time[..]
Nope, you can go swim in the shallow end all you want, it's
no concern of mine how addled you get using three aliases
to try and make your shallow-minded postings look impotent..
--See subject header for details..
|
