"3402 Dead" <zepp22113402@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:01kj435dobor7ib2a321oegagogv8levk5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 15:00:55 GMT, "Billary/2008"
> <F#%K_Liberals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"3396 Dead" <zepp22113396@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:jucj43hsmt7jrjrv6tj25rb70lo89b435e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:46:38 GMT, "Billary/2008"
>>> <F#%K_Liberals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"3396 Dead" <zepp22113396@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:gt4i43p3tcnjbbvuni1sgu65oth49mju8m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> A marketing clown! Hoo, boy, that sure makes you an expert, doesn't
>>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No actually I was Field Systems Engineer (amongst another positions),
>>>>but
>>>>we
>>>>worked for the Sales & marketing division. And at the time MSFT was a
>>>>small
>>>>enough company were we field techs knew ALL the developers, architects
>>>>and
>>>>Marketing people. So I know what it takes Zippy to be a world class
>>>>Microsoft superstar. And you know what Zippy? I interviewed and
>>>>rejected
>>>>thousands of self-taught assholes like you. That's your problem. You
>>>>probably applied for a job at MSFT and were rejected for being under
>>>>qualified and just plain stupid. You took it personally, as well you
>>>>should. You self-taught Linux geeks are all morons.
>>>>
>>>
>>> An "engineer" working in marketing?
>>>
>>> Now that's just plain sad. Couldn't you get a real job?
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>That statement alone demonstrates how little you know about the software
>>industry and cor****ate America in particular.
>
> Actually, it brings it into sharp focus.
>
> Large cor****ations are far less efficient or capable than small
> businesses, despite the advantages of economics of scale, and none can
> even match the federal government for efficiency.
>
>>ALL technology companies have
>>Engineers working in their respective sales/marketing divisions. It's
how
>>sales get done. The sales and marketing people pull the customer in and
>>the
>>technical guys SELL the customer on fabulous technology. You obviously
>>have
>>no idea what it's like to sit in a room full of very bright, very
talented
>>MIS professionals and talk about the foundation and vision of your
>>technology. An idiot like you wouldn't know that because you've never
>>worked for the software industry, a major cor****ation or went to college
>>for
>>"technology". You're just another one of the undisciplined,
self-taught,
>>computer geek rabble that infests the planet. The best you'll ever do is
>>your backroom sup****t desk job. So make the best of it, this is as good
>>as
>>it gets for you.
>>
>>
> OK, "engineer", explain why Vista gets confused over how many disks
> are in the computer, and when you go to disk management to reassure it
> that the computer, in fact, has two HDs and six removeable drives, you
> find yourself looking at a blank screen, and not long after that, you
> get the blue screen of death?
>>
I think I've seen this problem once before. It occurred on a crashed
machine after the user first tried to reinstall the recovery volume that
came with the machine and THEN tried to upgrade to VISTA. The recovery
volume installed itself to the 2nd disk. Thus when VISTA tried to install
it found the boot volume on Disk 1 instead of Disk 0. But every situation
is different. I did a search at Microsoft.com and found 9 articles. try
this link to see any of the choices match the problem you are having.
http://sup****t.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx?catalog=LCID%3D1033&spid=11732&query=multiple+disk+error&adv=
|
