Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > President Clinton > Re: #Microsoft ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 41 Topic 152 of 187
Post > Topic >>

Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents

by "What Me Worry?" <__@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2007 at 04:24 PM

"Billary/2008" <F#%K_Liberals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message

news:NJh2i.14446$b67.4098@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <zzbunker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:1179195092.765484.263330@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>>   But, that was avoided because of the folly of history
>>   invvolved in spliiting up AT&T. Since it turns out that
>>   most of MS Windows is just stuff the IBM and Sun idiots
>>   lifted from Bell Labs. Since the major meance
>>   to the net is copyright thieves like the Wa****ngton morons
>>   and IBM, rather Offiice products that Microsoft
>>   makes for their idiot surfing Lodges in the woods.
>>   Since Microsoft knows much more about
>>   19th Century Standard Oil Company theivery that than  they
>>   do 21st Century computers or software.
>
> You don't know **** about the software industry or what drives
innovation 
> and competition in software.

I've worked on software that revolutionized computing in a disruptive way.

I can guarantee that you have used it, whether you realized it or not. 
(No, 
I won't tell you what it is, because that would make it fairly easy to 
ascertain my real identity.)

I can't think of a single product that Microsoft has ever developed that
was 
disruptively innovative.  They're all derivative, and in some cases
outright 
theft of innovations or standards, twisted into proprietary clones of 
formerly great software.  If Microsoft touches it, it will become 
proprietary, bloated, slow and unreliable almost without exception.

What disruptive innovations have you brought to computing, Billie?

> Idiots like you pretend to understand , but all you understand is the 
> alternate reality, anti-capitalist, anti-cor****ate leftist programming
you 
> were taught at a young age.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.  And wrong.  You're batting .000.  I assure you that 
(most of) the software I've worked on has been very much pro-capitalist,
and 
some of it has actually been licensed to Microsoft in the past.  But 
apparently your rightwing programming forces you get all defensive and
blast 
your hate spew in lieu of real discussion.

Here's a concept to blow your head to smithereens:  It is possible to use,

and to even like some Microsoft products, while simultaneously *also* 
liking, using and deploying *open source products.*  They can even exist
on 
the same computer!!

Let that one sink in.  Take some tranquilizers if it will help.

> You are a very good parrot for the Undisciplined, self-taught Linux 
> rabble.

For a ****ll who claims that Microsoft is "not trying to destroy Linux",
your 
hateful, ignorant shrieking proves otherwise.  Why is that, Billie?
 




 41 Posts in Topic:
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 20:19:01 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-14 16:17:10 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 21:52:16 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"liberalhere@[EMAIL   2007-05-14 23:56:15 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 00:06:46 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-14 17:15:25 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-14 20:52:56 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 12:30:37 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 21:13:46 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-15 16:24:43 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 21:57:21 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-15 15:05:07 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-15 17:23:34 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 21:47:28 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-14 14:49:23 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 21:58:08 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-14 15:05:46 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 22:07:41 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-14 15:18:51 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 11:18:32 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-15 10:05:27 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-15 16:25:16 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3396 Dead <zepp2211339  2007-05-14 19:00:59 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 11:46:38 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3396 Dead <zepp2211339  2007-05-15 06:21:46 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 15:00:55 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3402 Dead <zepp2211340  2007-05-15 15:24:38 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 16:07:15 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"." <.@[EMAI  2007-05-22 01:12:53 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3425 Dead <zepp2211342  2007-05-22 06:51:43 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"liberalhere@[EMAIL   2007-05-22 23:32:30 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3425 Dead <zepp2211342  2007-05-22 20:27:48 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"liberalhere@[EMAIL   2007-05-23 23:59:38 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"liberalhere@[EMAIL   2007-05-15 23:06:44 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
Steve <stevencanyon@[  2007-05-15 21:09:17 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"." <.@[EMAI  2007-05-19 23:07:32 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"." <.@[EMAI  2007-05-14 20:25:05 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 11:47:21 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3396 Dead <zepp2211339  2007-05-14 18:53:02 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"." <.@[EMAI  2007-05-14 20:23:54 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"lubow" <lub  2007-05-15 04:28:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 0:13:46 CST 2008.