"What Me Worry?" <__@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:N9udnXx-n7yBuNfbnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Billary/2008" <F#%K_Liberals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> message news:NJh2i.14446$b67.4098@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> <zzbunker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:1179195092.765484.263330@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>
>>> But, that was avoided because of the folly of history
>>> invvolved in spliiting up AT&T. Since it turns out that
>>> most of MS Windows is just stuff the IBM and Sun idiots
>>> lifted from Bell Labs. Since the major meance
>>> to the net is copyright thieves like the Wa****ngton morons
>>> and IBM, rather Offiice products that Microsoft
>>> makes for their idiot surfing Lodges in the woods.
>>> Since Microsoft knows much more about
>>> 19th Century Standard Oil Company theivery that than they
>>> do 21st Century computers or software.
>>
>> You don't know **** about the software industry or what drives
innovation
>> and competition in software.
>
> I've worked on software that revolutionized computing in a disruptive
way.
> I can guarantee that you have used it, whether you realized it or not.
> (No, I won't tell you what it is, because that would make it fairly easy
> to ascertain my real identity.)
>
> I can't think of a single product that Microsoft has ever developed that
> was disruptively innovative. They're all derivative, and in some cases
> outright theft of innovations or standards, twisted into proprietary
> clones of formerly great software. If Microsoft touches it, it will
> become proprietary, bloated, slow and unreliable almost without
exception.
>
> What disruptive innovations have you brought to computing, Billie?
>
>> Idiots like you pretend to understand , but all you understand is the
>> alternate reality, anti-capitalist, anti-cor****ate leftist programming
>> you were taught at a young age.
>
> Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. And wrong. You're batting .000. I assure you
that
> (most of) the software I've worked on has been very much pro-capitalist,
> and some of it has actually been licensed to Microsoft in the past. But
> apparently your rightwing programming forces you get all defensive and
> blast your hate spew in lieu of real discussion.
>
> Here's a concept to blow your head to smithereens: It is possible to
use,
> and to even like some Microsoft products, while simultaneously *also*
> liking, using and deploying *open source products.* They can even exist
> on the same computer!!
>
> Let that one sink in. Take some tranquilizers if it will help.
>
>> You are a very good parrot for the Undisciplined, self-taught Linux
>> rabble.
>
> For a ****ll who claims that Microsoft is "not trying to destroy Linux",
> your hateful, ignorant shrieking proves otherwise. Why is that, Billie?
>
You fraud, you aren't qualified to write a line of code beyond "Hello
World". Go peddle your lies somewhere else.
|
