"Billary/2008" <F#%K_Liberals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:51q2i.12116$NY3.1491@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "What Me Worry?" <__@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:N9udnXx-n7yBuNfbnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Billary/2008" <F#%K_Liberals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> message news:NJh2i.14446$b67.4098@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> <zzbunker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:1179195092.765484.263330@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>>
>>>> But, that was avoided because of the folly of history
>>>> invvolved in spliiting up AT&T. Since it turns out that
>>>> most of MS Windows is just stuff the IBM and Sun idiots
>>>> lifted from Bell Labs. Since the major meance
>>>> to the net is copyright thieves like the Wa****ngton morons
>>>> and IBM, rather Offiice products that Microsoft
>>>> makes for their idiot surfing Lodges in the woods.
>>>> Since Microsoft knows much more about
>>>> 19th Century Standard Oil Company theivery that than they
>>>> do 21st Century computers or software.
>>>
>>> You don't know **** about the software industry or what drives
>>> innovation and competition in software.
>>
>> I've worked on software that revolutionized computing in a disruptive
>> way. I can guarantee that you have used it, whether you realized it or
>> not. (No, I won't tell you what it is, because that would make it
fairly
>> easy to ascertain my real identity.)
>>
>> I can't think of a single product that Microsoft has ever developed
that
>> was disruptively innovative. They're all derivative, and in some cases
>> outright theft of innovations or standards, twisted into proprietary
>> clones of formerly great software. If Microsoft touches it, it will
>> become proprietary, bloated, slow and unreliable almost without
>> exception.
>>
>> What disruptive innovations have you brought to computing, Billie?
>>
>>> Idiots like you pretend to understand , but all you understand is the
>>> alternate reality, anti-capitalist, anti-cor****ate leftist programming
>>> you were taught at a young age.
>>
>> Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. And wrong. You're batting .000. I assure you
that
>> (most of) the software I've worked on has been very much
pro-capitalist,
>> and some of it has actually been licensed to Microsoft in the past.
But
>> apparently your rightwing programming forces you get all defensive and
>> blast your hate spew in lieu of real discussion.
>>
>> Here's a concept to blow your head to smithereens: It is possible to
>> use, and to even like some Microsoft products, while simultaneously
>> *also* liking, using and deploying *open source products.* They can
even
>> exist on the same computer!!
>>
>> Let that one sink in. Take some tranquilizers if it will help.
>>
>>> You are a very good parrot for the Undisciplined, self-taught Linux
>>> rabble.
>>
>> For a ****ll who claims that Microsoft is "not trying to destroy Linux",
>> your hateful, ignorant shrieking proves otherwise. Why is that,
Billie?
>>
>
> You fraud, you aren't qualified to write a line of code beyond "Hello
> World". Go peddle your lies somewhere else.
Translation: "I'm have nothing. I surrender."
|
