Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > President Clinton > Re: #Microsoft ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 31 of 41 Topic 152 of 187
Post > Topic >>

Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents

by "liberalhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <liberalhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 22, 2007 at 11:32 PM

3425 Dead <zepp22113425@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:v1t55316gu6468un64k3nljip23tg0hmmr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> On Tue, 22 May 2007 01:12:53 -0600, "." <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>Billary/2008 wrote:
>>> "3402 Dead" <zepp22113402@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> message news:01kj435dobor7ib2a321oegagogv8levk5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007 15:00:55 GMT, "Billary/2008"
>>>> <F#%K_Liberals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "3396 Dead" <zepp22113396@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>> message 
>>>>> news:jucj43hsmt7jrjrv6tj25rb70lo89b435e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:46:38 GMT, "Billary/2008"
>>>>>> <F#%K_Liberals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "3396 Dead" <zepp22113396@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>> message 
>>>>>>> news:gt4i43p3tcnjbbvuni1sgu65oth49mju8m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A marketing clown!  Hoo, boy, that sure makes you an
>>>>>>>> expert, doesn't it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No actually I was Field Systems Engineer (amongst
>>>>>>> another positions), but
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> worked for the Sales & marketing division.  And at the
>>>>>>> time MSFT was a small
>>>>>>> enough company were we field techs knew ALL the
>>>>>>> developers, architects and
>>>>>>> Marketing people.  So I know what it takes Zippy to be
>>>>>>> a world class Microsoft superstar. And you know what
>>>>>>> Zippy?  I interviewed and rejected
>>>>>>> thousands of self-taught assholes like you.  That's
>>>>>>> your problem. You probably applied for a job at MSFT
>>>>>>> and were rejected for being under qualified and just
>>>>>>> plain stupid.  You took it personally, as well you 
>>>>>>> should.  You self-taught Linux geeks are all morons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> An "engineer" working in marketing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that's just plain sad.  Couldn't you get a real job?
>>>>>>>
>>>>> That statement alone demonstrates how little you know
>>>>> about the software industry and cor****ate America in
>>>>> particular. 
>>>> Actually, it brings it into sharp focus.
>>>>
>>>> Large cor****ations are far less efficient or capable than
>>>> small businesses, despite the advantages of economics of
>>>> scale, and none can even match the federal government for
>>>> efficiency. 
>>>>
>>>>> ALL technology companies have
>>>>> Engineers working in their respective sales/marketing
>>>>> divisions.  It's how sales get done.  The sales and
>>>>> marketing people pull the customer in and the
>>>>> technical guys SELL the customer on fabulous technology. 
>>>>> You obviously have
>>>>> no idea what it's like to sit in a room full of very
>>>>> bright, very talented MIS professionals and talk about
>>>>> the foundation and vision of your technology.  An idiot
>>>>> like you wouldn't know that because you've never worked
>>>>> for the software industry, a major cor****ation or went to
>>>>> college for
>>>>> "technology".  You're just another one of the
>>>>> undisciplined, self-taught, computer geek rabble that
>>>>> infests the planet. The best you'll ever do is your
>>>>> backroom sup****t desk job.  So make the best of it, this
>>>>> is as good as
>>>>> it gets for you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> OK, "engineer", explain why Vista gets confused over how
>>>> many disks are in the computer, and when you go to disk
>>>> management to reassure it that the computer, in fact, has
>>>> two HDs and six removeable drives, you find yourself
>>>> looking at a blank screen, and not long after that, you 
>>>> get the blue screen of death?
>>> 
>>> I think I've seen this problem once before.  It occurred on
>>> a crashed machine after the user first tried to reinstall
>>> the recovery volume that came with the machine and THEN
>>> tried to upgrade to VISTA.  The recovery volume installed
>>> itself to the 2nd disk.  Thus when VISTA tried to install 
>>> it found the boot volume on Disk 1 instead of Disk 0.  But
>>> every situation is different.  I did a search at
>>> Microsoft.com  and found 9 articles.  try this link to see
>>> any of the choices match the problem you are having. 
>>> 
>>> http://sup****t.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx?catalog=LCI
>>> D%3D1033&spid=11732&query=multiple+disk+error&adv= 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>Hey, our own ****ing right wing zero and combo "Vista"
>>expert! 
> 
> Actually, the case was a "clean" install.  It turns out that
> if you just leave disk management on screen long enough (I
> happened to check in on it at about 35 minutes, planning on
> closing it) it will pop up with the list of drives, and then
> you can rename them and the system will be happy for a while.
>  But it does recur. 
> 
> Apparently Vista bombs, too.  I know a guy (new machine,
> clean install) who is getting memory dump screens at least
> twice a day without warning.  The machine doesn't have to be
> doing anything he says.  It just randomly crashes.  No
> warning, which would be pretty frustrating.

"Not doing anything"???? Try listening to the hard drive. Vista, 
like XP, will run in the background and the drive will buzz like 
crazy. I'm guessing it's one additional year less of life 
expectancy for the drive just because of Vista for every actual 
year of use.

I had a Word file, under Vista, that Word said was corrupt. Odd 
that this was the second time the file was unreadable because 
after re-creating the file, I printed it, then saved it, and 
immediately reopened it. It opened fine. 24 hours later....Word 
claims the file can't be read.


> 
> Between Microsoft making it hard to have two OSes on the same
> machine, the legal push against Linux, and now Gonzales
> pu****ng life sentences for music and software pirates, it
> looks like cor****ate America has decided that now is the time
> for an utterly captive, even slave market.
> --
> 
> "I am fully committed, as the administration's fully
> committed, to ensure that, with respect to every United
> States attorney position in this country, we will have a
> presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed United States
> attorney." 
> 
> --Alberto Gonzales, committing perjury before Congress
> 
> Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001      
> 
> Not dead, in jail, or a slave?  Thank a liberal!
> Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
> For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
> http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
> For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
> http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
> For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
> http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
> 
> a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
 




 41 Posts in Topic:
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 20:19:01 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-14 16:17:10 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 21:52:16 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"liberalhere@[EMAIL   2007-05-14 23:56:15 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 00:06:46 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-14 17:15:25 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-14 20:52:56 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 12:30:37 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 21:13:46 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-15 16:24:43 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 21:57:21 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-15 15:05:07 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-15 17:23:34 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 21:47:28 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-14 14:49:23 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 21:58:08 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-14 15:05:46 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-14 22:07:41 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-14 15:18:51 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 11:18:32 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Gandalf Grey"   2007-05-15 10:05:27 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"What Me Worry?"  2007-05-15 16:25:16 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3396 Dead <zepp2211339  2007-05-14 19:00:59 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 11:46:38 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3396 Dead <zepp2211339  2007-05-15 06:21:46 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 15:00:55 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3402 Dead <zepp2211340  2007-05-15 15:24:38 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 16:07:15 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"." <.@[EMAI  2007-05-22 01:12:53 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3425 Dead <zepp2211342  2007-05-22 06:51:43 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"liberalhere@[EMAIL   2007-05-22 23:32:30 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3425 Dead <zepp2211342  2007-05-22 20:27:48 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"liberalhere@[EMAIL   2007-05-23 23:59:38 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"liberalhere@[EMAIL   2007-05-15 23:06:44 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
Steve <stevencanyon@[  2007-05-15 21:09:17 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"." <.@[EMAI  2007-05-19 23:07:32 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"." <.@[EMAI  2007-05-14 20:25:05 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"Billary/2008"   2007-05-15 11:47:21 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
3396 Dead <zepp2211339  2007-05-14 18:53:02 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"." <.@[EMAI  2007-05-14 20:23:54 
Re: #Microsoft claims Linux violates 235 patents
"lubow" <lub  2007-05-15 04:28:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 0:11:32 CST 2008.