Re: Clinton Pardons in Jan 2001

"Kurt Nicklas" <nicklask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1183734859.584346.145880@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 3, 10:46 pm, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > "Billary/2008" <F#%K_Liber...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
> >
> > news:%dxii.1575$Np2.260@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > Read this list: Marc Rich is in it.  So are "friends" of Alcee
Hastings.
> >
> > Who cares? Before Clinton's pardons, nobody had ever heard of Marc
Rich.
> > He's nowhere the criminal that Libby is.
> >
> > Anyway, you're posting a tu quoque fallacy: "But Clinton but Clinton
but
> > Clinton!"
>
> Give it up, Nullson. You NEVER whine when some of your friends like
> Jamison and
> Holloman use tu quoques.

They don't resort to logical fallacies.


-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com