On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:44:44 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertmccallum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>On Apr 19, 10:55 pm, Goo wrote:
>> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off, science illiterate and
>> proud of it, blabbered:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 19, 12:13 am, Goo wrote:
>> >> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off and proud of it,
blabbered:
>>
>> >>> On Apr 18, 12:12 pm, Goo wrote:
>> >>>> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off and proud of it,
blabbered:
>> >>>>> On Apr 18, 8:26 am, Goo wrote:
>> >>>>>> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off and proud of it,
blabbered:
>> >>>>>>> On Apr 18, 7:47 am, Goo wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off and proud of it,
blabbered:
>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 4:57 am, Goo wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> runny hamilton, purposeless jerk-off, engaged in hysterical
>> >>>>>>>>>> misrepresentation:
>> >>>>>>>>>> [...]
>> >>>>>>>>>> It is in no way comparable to bovine spongiform
encephalopathy, you
>> >>>>>>>>>> stupid ****.
>> >>>>>>>>> PROVED!
>> >>>>>>>> Nothing in science is ever "proved", you ignorant ****wit.
>> >>>>>>> Then why do you keep screaming "PROVED!"
>> >>>>>> In scientific matters, I don't say "proved", runny.
>> >>>>> It's ALL science in essence Goo.
>> >>>> non sequitur
>> >>>>>>>> But a) there was no suggestion anywhere in that story that
there was
>> >>>>>>>> anything wrong with the pigs' brains that was affecting the
pigs
>> >>>>>>>> themselves;
>> >>>>>>> The pigs in question were DEAD Goo.
>> >>>>>> runny, you lying jerk-off: there was *NO* suggestion in the
story that
>> >>>>>> the pigs were afflicted with *anything*. With "mad cow
disease", there
>> >>>>>> is a detectable ailment afflicting the cattle.
>> >>>>> Goo, any animal or human can have one or more prions circulating
in
>> >>>>> the blood stream.
>> >>>> Stupid purposeless **** runny: there is *NO* evidence to date
that
>> >>>> there was *anything* wrong with the pigs. As far as anyone can
tell, it
>> >>>> was perfectly healthy pig brain tissue.
>> >>> Yeh. Those workers were just malingering to get time off work.
>> >> No, they're sick with something. But there is *NO* evidence the
pigs
>> >> were sick with anything.
>>
>> > Of course not. Pigs never get sick.
>>
>> There is no evidence the pigs had anything like BSE.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>>>>> It would be difficult if not
>> >>>>>>> impossible to go back in time to when they were living and
study them.
>> >>>>>> Your *own* source indicated nothing about an ailment afflicting
the pigs.
>> >>>>> Gee Goo, is it in any way possible that the story was meant to
>> >>>>> DOWNPLAY a very serious problem?
>> >>>> Irrational belief in conspiratorial bull**** noted and sneered at.
>> >>>>>>>> and b) unlike humans who contract CJD from eating
>> >>>>>>>> prion-infected beef, the workers who have suffered the
neurological
>> >>>>>>>> damage have improved.
>> >>>>>>> Seemingly.
>> >>>>>> More than "seemingly".
>> >>>>> They are all on DRUGS Goo. Drugs will mask symptoms many times.
>> >>>> Your article didn't say that, liar. You know - the article that
*you*
>> >>>> cited earlier, but now in the most recent post have suddenly
denigrated
>> >>>> as "downplaying" the im****tance of the ailment.-
>> >>> Goo when that many workers
>> >> 24, in three plants, out of many thousands who work slaughtering
pigs.
>> >> All were using a novel and since discontinued method of extracting
pig
>> >> brains by blasting them out with compressed air.
>>
>> >> Your inference about what happened is bull****.-
>>
>> > So now you infer their illness has something to do with compressed
>> > air?
>>
>> It isn't known what caused their illness.
>
>Dear Jonathan Ball,
>
>Please furnish us with evidence of your scientific literacy. Did you
>study any science subjects at university? What does your scientific
>reading background consist of?
Goo wouldn't be a reliable source about things like that
even if he did provide some answer(s), because we know
what a liar he is. It's amusing to consider that he might
tell the truth about that since it's so very unlikely. The
Goober does reveal truths about his "education" sometimes
though, and I like to share this collection of Goobal beliefs
when it seems like a good time to consider just how stupid
he is (which is fairly frequently :-), so here are some things
that Goo thinks he has learned about animals:
"Dogs NEVER anticipate, nor do cats, or cattle, or
any other animal you've ever encountered." - Goo
"Animals do not experience frustration." - Goo
"Animals cannot be or feel disappointed." - Goo
"Non human animals experience neither pride nor
disappointment. They don't have the mental ability
to feel either." - Goo
"Darwin, a sentimental person, was projecting. He
saw something that wasn't there. He was, in a way,
hallucinating." - Goo
"The dog didn't do what Darwin said. His statement of
the "changes in behavior" is not reliable." - Goo
"Anticipation requires language." - Goo
"No animals anticipate." - Goo
"Dogs, cats, cattle, almost all animals "lower" than
the great apes have no sense of self." - Goo
"They are not aware that they can see. " - Goo
"They are *not* aware that they can smell." - Goo
"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be
pet food. " - Goo
_________________________________________________________
Ron asked:
>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance
>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price in
>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose of
>supplying the pet food industry?
Goo replied:
Yes.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
Ron pointed out:
>You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become
>PET FOOD.
Goo replied:
Some are.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
|
