Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Animals > Re: runny hamil...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 39 of 61 Topic 6042 of 6266
Post > Topic >>

Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)

by Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 21, 2008 at 07:45 PM

runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off, science illiterate and 
proud of it, blabbered:
> On Apr 22, 10:10 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off, science illiterate and
proud of it, blabbered: 
>>> On Apr 22, 7:14 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off, science illiterate and
>>>> proud of it, blabbered:
>>>>> On Apr 22, 6:48 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off, science illiterate
and
>>>>>> proud of it, blabbered:
>>>>>>> On Apr 22, 12:45 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> runny hamilton, lifelong purposeless jerk-off, science illiterate
and proud of it, blabbered:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 21, 5:40 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So just how *healthy* do you believe these pigs to be, Rudy?
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that any illness was afflicting the
pigs.  There is
>>>>>>>>>>>> no evidence of anything similar to BSE.
>>>>>>>>>> Implicit acknowledgment noted and accepted.
>>>>>>>>> You're trying to make YOUR statement appear to be made
>>>>>>>>> by me.
>>>>>>>> No, I wasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They haven't been PROVEN healthy
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no *evidence* that they were ill in any way.
>>>>>>>>>> Implicit acknowledgment noted and accepted.
>>>>>>>>> You're trying to make YOUR statement appear to be made
>>>>>>>>> by me.
>>>>>>>> No.  See above.
>>>>>>>>>> Not because there's any illness afflicting the pigs, of course,
but
>>>>>>>>>> purely for economic
reasons.http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iSMncueqK8aXsX56BCX6dCv...
>>>>>>>>>> You stupid ****tard.-
>>>>>>>>> Let's watch how this mysterious illness contracted by pig
slaughterers
>>>>>>>>> plays out shall we Rudy?
>>>>>>>> It most likely will emerge that there is nothing wrong with the
pigs.
>>>>>>> And what is the basis for that statement?
>>>>>> The researchers have found nothing wrong with them so far, and
they've
>>>>>> been looking.
>>>>> And you know this how?
>>>> The article, you stupid ****:
>>>>     "It doesn't appear that the slaughtered pigs have been ill," said
Dr.
>>>>     James Sejvar, a neurologist and epidemiologist at the CDC.
>>>>
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hqaebpM28dOdHO2Fop0x-o06mxqQD9037NQG2
>>>> Another
sitehttp://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AANMeeting/tb/9147indicates
>>>> that it does not appear to be due to any illness in the pigs.
>>>> Researchers are looking.  They say that so far, they haven't found
any
>>>> illness in the pigs.  You have no reason to doubt them.
>>>>>>>> In any case, the mass slaughter of 150,000 has nothing to do with
the
>>>>>>>> ailments of the meat packing plant workers.
>>>>>> So, you implicitly acknowledge by your silence that you were
>>>>>> bull****ing when you tried to pretend there is a connection
between the
>>>>>> Canadian pig slaughter and the ailment that is afflicting the
>>>>>> meatpacking workers.  There is no connection.  The Canadian
government
>>>>>> is talking about slaughtering 150,000 pigs solely to try to manage
the
>>>>>> market for ****k.-
>>>>> That's what *they* are saying Rudy
>>>> That's what the reason is, jerk-off.  It's purely to reduce the
supply
>>>> of ****k.
>>>>> but there has already been a
>>>>> health problem with Canada's pigs.
>>>> Cite it.
>>> http://tinyurl.com/3tx7ru
>> Nothing to do with the 150,000 pig slaughter.  Salmonellosis is present
>> in lots of things, and live pigs don't carry it.  It's a food handling
>> problem, not a disease affecting live pigs.
>>
>> You are so ****ing stupid.-
> 
> 
> Rudy, pay particular attention to the part about which ANIMALS can
> carry salmonella.

It's in the intestines, you ****ing moron, not the flesh.  If the food 
handlers properly handle the meat, there's no salmonella in it.

You lose every time:

  * There is no evidence there was any disease afflicting
    the pigs in the case of the slaughterhouse workers
    suffering neurological damage

  * There is no evidence the pigs slaughtered for the pet food
    were carrying salmonella anywhere except their gut, where it
    does not affect them

  * The slaughter of 150,000 pigs in Canada was purely to raise the
    price of ****k
 




 61 Posts in Topic:
Mad Pig Disease?
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-17 11:14:04 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-17 11:57:05 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-17 14:32:24 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-17 14:47:34 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-17 15:24:52 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-17 15:26:20 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-17 15:44:21 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-17 19:12:17 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-18 02:57:21 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-18 07:13:20 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-04-18 05:08:40 
Re: Mad Pig Disease?
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-18 12:20:43 
runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-19 07:55:14 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-19 13:37:03 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-19 14:42:51 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-19 14:51:57 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-19 16:04:06 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-19 16:10:41 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-19 17:31:56 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-19 18:32:25 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-19 22:05:43 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-04-19 18:44:44 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-21 09:48:20 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-04-19 19:54:55 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-20 05:41:14 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 00:40:44 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-21 05:29:19 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 07:45:19 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-21 13:46:31 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 13:48:15 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-21 13:56:49 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 14:14:21 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 16:14:20 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-21 16:18:01 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 17:08:10 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-21 16:29:21 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 17:10:00 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-21 19:09:29 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 19:45:40 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-21 21:31:51 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 21:37:51 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-04-21 23:05:11 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-21 23:26:44 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-04-22 01:44:39 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-22 07:26:56 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-22 13:03:30 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-22 13:04:37 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-22 13:39:55 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-22 13:53:49 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-04-22 15:28:14 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-22 18:27:33 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-04-22 15:46:51 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-22 18:29:36 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-04-22 20:57:28 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-23 04:33:46 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-23 07:03:46 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-23 10:05:26 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-04-23 18:20:04 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-04-24 02:06:21 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-24 15:29:41 
Re: runny hamilton: science illiterate (Re: Mad Pig Disease?)
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-04-24 12:50:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 21:04:57 CDT 2008.