If we don't use animals, what will we use?
http://www.curedisease.net/faqs/faq02.shtml
This statement falsely assumes that animal experiments have been
responsible for medical advances in the past. However, the real
benchmarks of medical progress have relied on the following non-animal
methodologies, as will future developments.
In vitro (test tube) research has been instrumental in many of the
great discoveries - of antibiotics, for example, and the structure of
DNA, as well as all the vaccines we have today, including polio and
meningitis.
Epidemiology (population research) revealed that folic acid deficiency
causes birth defects, that smoking causes lung cancer and that lead
damages children's brains.
Post-mortem studies are responsible for much of our modern medical
knowledge - including the repair of congenital heart defects in
babies.
Genetic research has elucidated how certain genes are responsible for
some diseases. DNA chips allow doctors to prescribe the right drug for
specific patients, thus reducing serious side effects of chemotherapy,
for example.
Clinical studies of patients have given us most of our current
treatments and cures - including our treatments of lazy eye and the
knowledge that HIV transmission from mother to baby can be prevented.
Human tissue is vital in the study of human disease and drug testing -
animal tissues differ in crucial ways.
Computer modelling is now very sophisticated, with virtual human
organs and virtual metabolism programmes which predict drug effects in
humans far more accurately than animals can.
Advances in technology are largely responsible for the high standard
of medical care we receive today, including MRI and PET scanners,
ultrasound, laser surgery, cochlear implants, laparascopic surgery,
artificial organs, pacemakers and even surgery to correct spina bifida
in the womb.
Human stem cells have already treated children with leukaemia and
promise to deliver great benefits in the future.
|
