On Sat, 10 May 2008 05:08:14 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghole-jonnie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 10, 11:37 am, Goo lied:
>
>> There was mangling, just as you do, Goo. You're the most dishonest
>> poster ever encountered in this group.-
>
>
>There was no mangling, Boobs. Only you mangle.
That's pretty much true. No one does it as stupidly as Goo
anyway, and most people do it extremely rarely if ever. What
if most people were like Goo? Just the one Goober ruined
the ng.
>Every time one of your idiotic statements comes back to haunt you,
>there is a great amount of squealing and crying from your corner.
LOL. Well said. Not always so though, because sometimes
Goo tries to defend his claims in his Goobal way of simply
insisting they are true, and other times he claims to disagree
with himself but never seems able to explain how. The "Dutch"
character is prone to that as well, I've noticed.
One of the Goober's biggest objections is when someone
omits dishonesty and attempted trickery from his quotes. We
know Goo agrees with eliminationists that no farm animals
benefit from farming:
"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo
We know Goo agrees that regardles of how decent the
conditions, the deliberate killing erases any good from it:
"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
of the animals erases all of it." - Goo
so from the above we can conclude Goo agrees that the moral
harm is greater than any benefit they might derive since he
claimed specifically that they derive none, and also because
he specifically said that's how he feels:
"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo
"the nutritionally unnecessary choice deliberately to kill an animal
ALWAYS causes a moral harm greater in magnitude than . . . the
moral "benefit" realized by the animal in existing at all" - Goo
The Goober claims to disagree with himself sometimes, yet he
can never explain how. The supposed "mangling" Goo cried
about is simply not including his dishonest attempts to make it
appear that he doesn't agree with the ideas he's promoting. We
know Goo feels life is no benefit and he thinks the moral harm
from killing makes it of negative value regardless of all else, so
from that we know Goo agrees with himself that not raising them
in the first place is the ethically superior choice:
"IF one believes that the moral harm caused by killing
them is greater in magnitude than ANY benefit they might
derive from "decent lives", then logically one MUST
conclude that not raising them in the first place is the
ethically superior choice."
even when he lies and tries to deny it. From his own quotes
we also know the Goober feels that some people should be
veg*ns:
"People who don't want them to exist should
be "vegans"." - Goo
so any criticism he makes about it to people who are, is
just another display of Goobal idiotics, disagreeing with
himself without being able to explain how...
|
