Re: Time to Start Shooting "animal rights" Psychopaths

Rupert wrote:
> On Jul 6, 1:47 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> These quotations from David Harrison are certainly very interesting.
>>> Engaging in an activity which is like to cause injury or death to
>>> humans, or for that matter any sentient being, is not an ethically
>>> justifiable way to behave
>> So, I guess you never operate - hell, never even use - motor vehicles,
>> right?
>>
>> You stupid ****witted prig.  You have *ZERO* standing to be lecturing
>> anyone on ethical behavior.  You're a pompous, egotistical ****.
> 
> You really are a bit weird, Rudy.

No, you pompous egotistical ****.


> I wasn't lecturing anyone about
> ethical behaviour,

We were lecturing people about ethical behavior, you lying ****wit.  You 
just told people that "engaging in an activity which is like [sic] to 
cause injury or death to humans, or for that matter any sentient being, 
is not an ethically justifiable way to behave."  That was lecturing 
people about ethical behavior.  What the **** is wrong with you?


> I made a comment, the main point of which was that
> I don't morally approve of the use of violent tactics in political
> activism,

That's not what you said.  You said "engaging in an activity which is 
like [sic] to cause injury or death to humans, or for that matter any 
sentient being, is not an ethically justifiable way to behave."  Driving 
a motor vehicle is such an activity.


> I wasn't anticipating that this stance would be
> controversial. I've certainly got as much right to offer my thoughts
> about morality as anyone else.

You do more than that.  You pompously set yourself up as some kind of 
ethical philosopher.