Re: Stumbling bumbling dog-blowing cracker, David Harrison - aka

You got beat like a mean dog *again*, Goo!  You just
never tire of getting your ass kicked; very bizarre.


Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in existence 
- blabbered and presented no challenge:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Rudy D. Canoza wrote:
> 
>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in
existence - blabbered and presented no challenge: 
>>
>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Rudy N. Canoza wrote:
>>>
>>>> I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"
>>> "When the entity moves from "pre-existence"

Not speaking on my own account, Goo.


>> Here's what I wrote:
>>
>>    No living entity benefits by coming into existence.
>>    Why not?
>>
>>    Either the entity "pre-exists" before it comes into
>>    the existence we know, or it doesn't pre-exist.  If
>>    it doesn't, then life is not a benefit, because
>>    "benefit" is defined as something that improves the
>>    welfare of an entity, and prior to the entity
>>    existing, it had no welfare that could be improved. 
> 
>     How do you think anything to do with pre-existence
> prevents existing beings from benefitting from their own
> existence, Rudy? 

Not what we're talking about, Goo; never was.


>>    Therefore, existence - life _per se_ - is not a benefit. 
> 
>     You didn't explain Rudy. 

I did, Goo, but apparently it's beyond your ability to understand.  Much 
is, Goo.