On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:18:03 -0700, Goo wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:07:02 -0100, <dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Goo desperately and blatantly lied:
>
>>On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:10:06 -0100, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Goo wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:57:40 -0100, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Goo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>JerkOffX wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:11:01 -0100, dh wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "coming into existence didn't make me better off than I was
before." -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this is a good one!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's a true statement. Coming into existence is not a benefit. A
>>>>>>benefit is something that improves an entity's welfare, and coming
into
>>>>>>existence doesn't do that, because prior to existing, there was no
welfare.
>>>>>
>>>>> Try explaining how you think anything regarding pre-existence
>>>>>can prevent existing entities from benefitting from their existence,
>>>>>Goo. Try hard. Go:
>>>>
>>>>You
>>>
>>> LOL! You lost that one due to complete ineptitude, Goo. I challenge
>>>you to try answering the question, and you will cowardly fail
again...you
>>>cowardly failed this time as you have every other time, and will
continue
>>>to fail every time.
>>
>>No, I didn't lose
>
> You have always failed completely to meet the challenge. I challenge
>you to try to meet it now Goober, and you will fail again.
>
>I have never failed,
You failed again this time Goober, as I pointed out that
you would in advance.
>and there never was any challenge
The challenge remains, and of course you remain a
complete failure.
|
