Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in existence
- blabbered and presented no challenge:
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:18:03 -0700, Rudy A. Canoza wrote:
>
> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in existence
- blabbered and presented no challenge:
>
>> On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Rudy B. Canoza wrote:
>>
>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in
existence - blabbered and presented no challenge:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Rudy D. Canoza wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in
existence - blabbered and presented no challenge:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Rudy G. Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JerkOffX wrote:
>>>>>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in
existence - blabbered and presented no challenge:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "coming into existence didn't make me better off than I was
before." -
>>>>>>>> this is a good one!
>>>>>>> It's a true statement. Coming into existence is not a benefit. A
>>>>>>> benefit is something that improves an entity's welfare, and coming
into
>>>>>>> existence doesn't do that, because prior to existing, there was no
welfare.
>>>>>> Try explaining how you think anything regarding pre-existence
>>>>>> can prevent existing entities from benefitting from their
existence,
>>>>>> Goo. Try hard. Go:
>>>>> You
>>>> LOL! You lost that one due to complete ineptitude, Goo. I
challenge
>>>> you to try answering the question, and you will cowardly fail
again...you
>>>> cowardly failed this time as you have every other time, and will
continue
>>>> to fail every time.
>>> No, I didn't lose
>> You have always failed completely to meet the challenge. I challenge
>> you to try to meet it now Goober, and you will fail again.
>>
>> I have never failed, Goo - pig-****er.
>
> You failed again
No, Goo. I have shown you - Goo - to be a liar.
>> and there never was any challenge
>
> The challenge
No challenge. You couldn't challenge a comatose two-year-old, Goo.
|
