Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, due to his incredible ineptitude, Goo desperately
lied:

>On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:17:57 -0100, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:18:37 GMT, Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>David wrote:
>>>
>>>>     How do you think anything to do with pre-existence
>>>> prevents existing beings from benefitting from their own
>>>> existence
>>>
>>>"benefiting from existence" is a circular and meaningless expression.
>>
>>    That doesn't prevent existing beings from benefitting from their own
>>existence.
>>
>>>If something is a benefit to me, that implies necessarily that its 
>>>absence would be a loss to me. But if my existence were absent that 
>>>could not be a loss to me, because there would be no me to lose
anything.
>>
>>    That doesn't prevent existing beings from benefitting from their own
>>existence.
>>
>>>The only way that the concept "benefit from existence" can begin to
make 
>>>sense semantically is if one assumes a pre-existent state which is less

>>>desirable than existence.
>>
>>    That doesn't prevent existing beings from benefitting from their own
>>existence.
>>
>>>You do not deserve all the attempts people have made over the years to 
>>>help you grasp this.
>>
>>    So far you haven't even come close to explaining how you think
>>pre-existent "entities" or anything else about pre-existence prevents 
>>existing beings from benefitting from their own existence. That means
>>that in all the attempts people have made over the years COMBINED
>>we still have absolutely nothing to consider. NOTHING.
>
>You never were talking about existing beings

    Of course that's a lie Goo, since we refer to them very frequently.
That lie is clearly shown to be a lie in this very thread by at least one
of your previous lies, Goob:

"The only way that the concept "benefit from existence" can begin 
to make sense semantically is if one assumes a pre-existent state" - Goo

Looking back we see that you proved this particular lie to be a
lie years ago too, Goo:
_________________________________________________________
From: d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:52:48 -0500

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:03:26 GMT, Goober Gonad Canoza proclaimed:
[...]
>Life is not a benefit for farm animals.
[...]
>Life is not a benefit for farm animals
[...]
>Life is not a benefit for farm animals.  
[...]
>Life is not a benefit for farm animals.

    Do you wish on a star when you repeat that Goober? 
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Now that we've acknowledged another of your lies, 
let's get back to another one of the questions that
are challenging you and you are completely unable
to attempt answering. Goo, try explaining exactly
how you think pre-existent entities are preventing
you from benefitting from your own existence. GO: