Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???

Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in existence 
- blabbered and presented no challenge:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, due to his incredible ineptitude, Rudy M. Canoza
wrote:
> 
>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in
existence - blabbered and presented no challenge: 
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:18:37 GMT, Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in
existence - blabbered and presented no challenge: 
>>>>
>>>>>     How do you think anything to do with pre-existence
>>>>> prevents existing beings
>> You never were talking about existing beings
> 
>     Of course that's a lie Rudy, 

It isn't.  We have your quotes to prove it:

        The animals that will be raised for us to eat
        are more than just "nothing", because they
        *will* be born unless something stops their
        lives from happening. Since that is the case,
        if something stops their lives from happening,
        whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
        them of the life they otherwise would have had.
        ****wit - 12/09/1999

That's about your beloved "pre-existing" animals, Goo.


        Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
        born if nothing prevents that from happening,
        that would experience the loss if their lives
        are prevented.
        ****wit - 08/01/2000

So is that, Goo.


        What gives you the right to want to deprive
        them [unborn animals] of having what life they
        could have?
        ****wit - 10/12/2001

So is that, Goo.


        What I'm saying is unfair for the animals that
        *could* get to live, is for people not to
        consider the fact that they are only keeping
        these animals from being killed, by keeping
        them from getting to live at all.
        ****wit - 10/19/1999

So is that, Goo.


        If you keep an animal from being born which
        would have been born without your interference,
        you have denied life to it, whether it actually
        exists or not.
        ****wit - 28 Sept 1999 http://tinyurl.com/2x3ogu

So is that, Goo.

You lied, Goo.  You were always and *ONLY* talking about "pre-existing" 
animals, and the <snicker> terrible wrong you claim "vegans" want to do 
to them by preventing them from being born.