Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:01:26 -0700, Rudy Canoza
<pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:05:44 -0100, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Goo lied:
>>
>>>On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:33:08 -0100, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Goo lied:
>>>>
>>>>>You lied, Goo.  You were always and *ONLY* talking about
"pre-existing" 
>>>>>animals, 
>>>>
>>>>    Of course that's a lie Goo, since we do discuss livestock.
>>>
>>>OF course it is the truth, Goo, because I provided the evidence, which 
>>>you gutlessly snipped.
>>
>>    LOL!!! Well Goober, how do you think you "provided the 
>>evidence" that we never discuss livestock? Try providing
>>evidence that we never discuss them Goob. GO:
>
>Not sure why you think my proving that you're a liar is funny.

    You can't do it Goo, and the funny part is the blatancy of your
dishonesty when you lie and say you've done it. Again I challenge
you to try. TRY:

(correct prediction - the Goober will not only fail to meet the 
challenge, but will also fail to make any attempt to meet it.
Goo will lose by forfeit due to total ineptitude AGAIN.)

>>    Now that you mention it Goo, one of the things on your list
>>of cowardices is your cowardice to explain exactly WHY you
>>don't want anyone to give the lives of billions of livestock any
>>consideration. Try explaining it now Goo. GO:

    The above challenge also still remains, Goo.

(correct prediction - the Goober will not only fail to meet the 
challenge, but will also fail to make any attempt to meet it.
Goo will lose by forfeit due to total ineptitude AGAIN.)