Re: Pre-existent "entities" ruining our lives???

Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest pig-****ing cracker in existence 
- blabbered and presented no challenge:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:28:52 GMT, Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:29:55 GMT, Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> The Logic of the Larder was defeated in 1914. Many legitimate
arguments 
>>>> exist for the humane use of animals, LoL (aptly) is not one of them.
>>>>
>>>> "It is often said, as an excuse for the slaughter of animals, that it
is 
>>>> better for them to live and to be butchered than not to live at all.
" - Salt
>>>     Only to people who believe that experiencing a decent life of 
>>> positive value is better than not experiencing it, 
>> It's an illegitimate argument. The wish is so obviously father to the 
>> thought...
> 
>     Try explaining how you think that prevents livestock from
> benefitting from their lives.

Never were talking about that, Goo.  We only were talking about your 
insane obsession with "pre-existent" livestock, and how "vegans" were 
trying to do terrible harm to "them".  That's all you ever were on 
about, Goo.  That's proved.


>>>     There's nothing that you have ever written, said, or
>>> thought that tells us how you think pre-existent entities
>>> are ruining our lives. So I AGAIN challenge you to try
>>> explaining it NOW:
>> How did you get this confused? 
> 
>     The confusion is on your end

The confusion, and the obsession, and the utter irrationality, are 
entirely on your end, Goo.