On Jul 23, 5:08 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> ****wit is only interested in animals for himself. He
> likes "meat...gravy." "aras" confront him with a truth
> that ****wit cannot address: that ****wit's
> consumption of "meat...gravy" harms animals interests.
> ****wit *wants* to take the "aras'" case apart, but
> he can't. Instead, he tries to beat them at their own
> game, by imagining a *new* right or interest held
> by...non-existent animals. It falls completely flat,
> because a) it's patently absurd; b) it has already
> been demolished, over a century ago; and c) ****wit is
> too sophomorically inept to have any hope of making it
> work.
>
> The entire thing, nine years of wasted time, was just
> ****wit trying to justify HIS pursuit of HIS interest.
> ****wit does not care and never cared about animals'
> well-being. He just wants "meat...gravy."
You can't make any credible case against animal rights either.
|
