On Jul 23, 10:50=A0pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Jul 23, 5:08 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> ****wit is only interested in animals for himself. =A0He
> >> likes "meat...gravy." =A0"aras" confront him with a truth
> >> that ****wit cannot address: =A0that ****wit's
> >> consumption of "meat...gravy" harms animals interests.
> >> =A0 ****wit *wants* to take the "aras'" case apart, but
> >> he can't. =A0Instead, he tries to beat them at their own
> >> game, by imagining a *new* right or interest held
> >> by...non-existent animals. =A0It falls completely flat,
> >> because a) it's patently absurd; =A0b) it has already
> >> been demolished, over a century ago; =A0and c) ****wit is
> >> too sophomorically inept to have any hope of making it
> >> work.
>
> >> The entire thing, nine years of wasted time, was just
> >> ****wit trying to justify HIS pursuit of HIS interest.
> >> ****wit does not care and never cared about animals'
> >> well-being. =A0He just wants "meat...gravy."
>
> > You can't make any credible case against animal rights either.
>
> I can and have.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Show us where.
|
